Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<mvflpj50j5psa4nkqqbdqf5alhab2ss7nu@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-01-28 (Tuesday)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:56:49 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <mvflpj50j5psa4nkqqbdqf5alhab2ss7nu@4ax.com>
References: <UBI20250128@dont-email.me> <vndmp4$2emas$1@dont-email.me> <vndnkh$2fet9$1@dont-email.me> <vndq0i$2emar$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:56:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84140710aea6cace2a8b2ed80b03df1d";
	logging-data="2754959"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/JxL2tILiXc2l9PfRR7/tNYWPMoDpBD/Q="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EtWesZCOYMo4diHW4uZu73ohT7A=
Bytes: 2112

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:54:25 -0800, "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid>
wrote:

>On 1/29/25 9:13 AM, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
>> On 1/29/2025 8:59 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>
>>> What did you watch?
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> I watched:
>> 
>> Watson - New CBS show about Sherlock Holmes' partner Dr. Watson (Morris 
>> Chestnut).  Following Holmes' death Watson returns to the U.S. to run a 
>> medical clinic.  This show is basically "House" with Watson and his team 
>> of doctors taking on a weird medical case that stumps all the other 
>> doctors.  But Watson uses the deduction techniques he learned from 
>> Holmes to solve the cases.  The only thing that makes this show 
>> different than "House" is a spoiler I can't mention yet.

Yet it is a rather obvious sort of spoiler.

>That's disappointing - I assumed he'd be a doctor who solved 
>mysteries/crimes on the side. If this really is "House-redux", then I 
>can't say I am interested in it at all.

It's well written and acted but it is just a "House-redux" with a
nicer version of House.