Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:30:26 +0000
Subject: Re: No true relativist!
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <89ea9e0a4ddc271a7bc16200c6a5dbb4@www.novabbs.com>
 <uC6dnQAond6lYLP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <3c273ef12b9952ba62097af7c82733a1@www.novabbs.com>
 <89a6d08110a99bf650447fa73d9bd658@www.novabbs.com>
 <1f6a60640e4f17fec750e15c9e17a1a0@www.novabbs.com>
 <lpgggdF94cfU3@mid.individual.net>
 <afba1f0a5d5d999531fa8ec600569873@www.novabbs.com>
 <9016f2c495afc72a4968089491a13447@www.novabbs.com>
 <5a2cd3594f82f1855b7e8b452064f29c@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:30:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5a2cd3594f82f1855b7e8b452064f29c@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <n5SdnTha7LN_J676nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-lAx1P/jgqdFGbwuVletlmYtjSVhQV1vV0+af8TKY9N1C+oY7xKfe3gsUxAh+5CCaHA225CGy5ZzIxHZ!tty/ff2+6ChajAtpCo7Z0sapmjR5wyqGZAMXH+o8ydx7g9tCmBjLPQjxxTjK9ilPnsOh3tZ11frP
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2814

On 11/12/2024 12:12 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Ross' irrelevant, presumptuous, incoherent stream of unconsciousness! A
> grammar checker would help with sentence structure, smooth the wording
> (bloviating), and add coherence. Ross is pointlessly trying to show off
> and only shows that he doesn't understand that the basic assumptions are
> false. It seems Ross has gotten lost and hasn't assimilated the subjects
> he has studied. That much is clear.
>
> "Kodaira: Known for his contributions to complex geometry and the theory
> of complex manifolds."
>
> Geometric manifolds involve the reification fallacy and are nonsense.

What Kodaira does actually is build his own real-analytic setting
then he shows that it applies to whatever those complex-analytic
sorts purport to support, that Kodaira's "topological surgery" in
the interests of "integral analysis" is exactly _not_ an extension
in deMoivre/Euler/Gaussian-style (complete) analysis.


It's a replacement because the complex-analytic falls apart,
an emplacement.

So, Kodaira is known for being _independent_ complex analysis,
_in_ analysis, real-analytic.



Now run to your prayer booth and request its judgment on that.