Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<n71h5j5ls6v3u75eg8gr6sni800upq5l4i@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:04:37 +0000
From: john larkin <jl@650pot.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Yttrium iron garnet
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 07:04:36 -0700
Message-ID: <n71h5j5ls6v3u75eg8gr6sni800upq5l4i@4ax.com>
References: <v368qb$106vv$1@dont-email.me> <v37nll$17q1d$2@dont-email.me> <cipe5jtcttecs7r5k9pngm94gqseoo913u@4ax.com> <v393pp$1ihhr$1@dont-email.me> <v39g2i$1kegm$1@dont-email.me> <X1Z5O.409$Ktt5.58@fx40.iad>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
X-Trace: sv3-geMZ8BE36+mpVStw2eSdMCod/ENi8O0Z180ycMGlD7pCJFTnAV8FbX040YrOM49F6oNUY8jJutu1kl1!63pKrcqM8+1dYzqIJ70k3fMszX3EPOMrCDlVtXeolCGw3DCE2ycR2aDuL+2LGpRCjdp1+7BQR/FJ!li2A0w==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3135

On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:03:19 GMT, Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void>
wrote:

>On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:14:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>> 
>>> On 30/05/2024 3:37 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:12:21 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 13:52:34 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yttrium iron garnet tuned oscillators were around back then, but
>>>>>> their 2GHz to 8GHz range was too high for me to count with the
>>>>>> integrated circuits around then - we had to go the Gigabit Logic's
>>>>>> GaAs parts to get to 800MHz, and that became the unique selling
>>>>>> point of the system.
>>>>>
>>>>> YIG oscillators were quite the thing back in the day, but I'm
>>>>> guessing they've been completely superseded by now to get to ever
>>>>> higher frequencies. Seems we've gone from -
>>> 
>>> This misses Jan Panteltje's thread "Small magnetic tunable filter for
>>> 6G and beyond" which is about Yig being used today.
>> 
>> That article makes it seem like YIG is some revolutionary, new, emerging
>> technology!
>
>Use of YIG filters as a replacement for varactor tuning could turn out to 
>be significant.  2022 Microwave Journal article:
>
><https://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/37980-reinventing-yig-
>technology-for-microwave-filter-applications>

The VIDA oscillators still look like giant expensive power hogs. They
don't specify modulation bandwidth on the data sheets that I see, but
it must be terrible.

One can't modulate a hundreds-of-mA electromagnet very fast.

An LC osc with a varicap is a more sensible VCO. Narrowband, one can
varicap a coaxial ceramic resonator, or a PCB ring oscillator, or
something. Cheap and fast.

Of course, it's inherently difficult to modulate a high-Q resonator
fast, even without an electromagnet in the way.