Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 23:32:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Let's See What ChatGPT has to Say About The Snit Lists
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <XnsB2E1B947F1C2D1902iij2211@209.160.120.38>
From: % <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:32:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <XnsB2E1B947F1C2D1902iij2211@209.160.120.38>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250516-6, 2025-5-16), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <ne-dnbmubK2-Vrr1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 54
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-yeYycCfCcpGRnNDtjM+7lf0o63/hwccHVfuxaRlJr0RNvvDnkR4ciSauNqMcihfQC172mooD3WLce3j!wTaCn6jjKcdnEF559NxhzGXghhMfiBLP5MItmjqhNmaQCldJIKf2/bjDpcLplbkEFltuoogzYMoP
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40

Itamar Lichtman wrote:
> "Please analyze this website. How accurate are these claims against
> Usenet snit ?  http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html"
> 
> Oh and there is plenty more.
> Have fun !
> 
> [![Usenet Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)]
> (https://images.openai.com/thumbnails/666eccffd0e4720b6873ef7256cc304a.jp
> eg)](https://www.comparitech.com/fr/usenet/faq/)
> 
> The webpage you referenced, [cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html]
> (http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html), presents a detailed
> critique of Michael Glasser, known online as "Snit," alleging a pattern
> of disruptive behavior and dishonesty in Usenet newsgroups. The document
> outlines various tactics purportedly employed by Snit, such as
> misrepresentation, evasion, and personal attacks.([Google Groups][1])
> 
> ### Context and Community Feedback
> 
> The claims on the site are corroborated by numerous Usenet participants
> who have documented similar behaviors over an extended period. For
> instance, discussions in groups like comp.os.linux.advocacy and
> alt.computer.workshop highlight recurring patterns of Snit's conduct,
> including accusations of dishonesty and attempts to undermine other
> users. These accounts suggest that the behaviors described on the Cosmic
> Penguin site align with broader community experiences. ([Google Groups]
> [2], [Google Groups][1])
> 
> ### Evaluating the Claims
> 
> While the Cosmic Penguin document provides an in-depth analysis, it's
> important to approach such critiques with a critical eye. The content is
> presented from a perspective that is clearly antagonistic toward Snit,
> which may influence the tone and emphasis of the claims. However, the
> consistency of the behaviors described across various independent sources
> lends credibility to the assertions.
> 
> ### Conclusion
> 
> The allegations presented on the Cosmic Penguin site appear to be
> grounded in documented interactions within Usenet communities. While the
> site serves as a comprehensive compilation of these incidents, readers
> should consider the context and potential biases inherent in such a
> focused critique. Engaging with a range of sources can provide a more
> balanced understanding of the situation.([Google Groups][1])
> 
> [1]: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/iJE1h4m9
> _uc/m/9xreK8lxAQAJ?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Re: Snit destroys another
> USENET group"
> [2]: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/AVU7J_lMYmU?
> utm_source=chatgpt.com "Snit *The Despicable, lying, troll*"
> 
fact checker says no