Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: cyclists attack auto driver
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:42:14 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <nns5cjhvfa23vbjhongnv94u0bs1ags6tl@4ax.com>
References: <v9l8ud$10n7l$2@dont-email.me> <o4csbjdtu8t99sjjeeijjshjs17ko4miln@4ax.com> <v9ldee$10n7m$7@dont-email.me> <v9ldkv$11ai1$2@dont-email.me> <uefubjl289nishqcq5eqdeqdj0vj0rt7t6@4ax.com> <v9o65q$1h8t3$1@dont-email.me> <0ibvbjtnogf47avmn1v8rj5sf94g9corum@4ax.com> <v9ot76$1kbqe$3@dont-email.me> <v9p1b4$1kr20$4@dont-email.me> <r7m2cjtbv5ukduqa852b1o87o9pfh97o8n@4ax.com> <v9tf33$2fm0s$4@dont-email.me> <4pk4cjh6lokkmah8hu0dfqu0gq99akff7l@4ax.com> <v9u4bv$2is2s$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:42:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea1a2f615400d0c70bc1d0953b8b8392";
	logging-data="2942046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mvN9Q9sxSGfzgV35tspsDJHh8Ar7jjHM="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EbzaIOcZeHRSm6LhERaYOZ2M5dE=
Bytes: 3292

On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:41:35 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On 8/18/2024 4:19 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:38:26 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/17/2024 11:37 PM, John B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But as I've mentioned  a number of times my family has had guns for at
>>>> least 4 generations, as close as I can calculate 300 years or so, and
>>>> never shot anyone. Why does Frankie want to penalize us?
>>>
>>> My bet is that your family had guns for hunting and pest control. My bet
>>> is also that your family never owned a gun that could fire more than,
>>> say, six rounds in a minute. After all, that capability is essentially
>>> useless for almost all hunting. But it is "useful" if you intend to kill
>>> a roomful of kids, or church attendees. That is the gun style's
>>> significant detriment.
>>>
>>> As you _should_ be able to remember, I'm firmly in favor of hunting.
>> 
>> That's nonsense. My dad's old Winchester model 69 (1930s) had an eight
>> round mag. My Colt Woodsman had a ten round mag. That didn't count the
>> one in the pipe. Counting that, put all the Wichester model 94s at 7
>> rds.
>
>I know those guns exist. 

No you don't. You never heard of them until I mentioned them.

>I'm betting John's family didn't have them.

You obviously have no idea how many hunters have had a Winchester 94.
I had one years ago. The one I had was a carbine and only had a 6 rd
mag. The model 94 rifle produced today has an 8 rd mag.  The 94 stands
for 1894, by the way. 

> And 
>while I may be wrong, it's certain that the earliest family members he 
>bragged about did not have them, but probably still hunted successfully. 
>A competent hunter doesn't need even six quick shots.


<LOL>  As if you'd know anything about competent hunting.