Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<o0lt3jlg3pcl5kpbo20bdapptppts19s4s@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=1R9W56\QFIJ9E:6N@`X^6NHWonT5<]0TMdjI?Uho:XeKlL51CP6LDLLZ1\1M:\WK>OPSm;@mReFaKioUcdMXCl[@^FQ5RF68;VGZR9b9UKd@N@ X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Windows 10 Pro, $5 USD, Still Ripoff Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 22:12:57 -0400 Message-ID: <o0lt3jlg3pcl5kpbo20bdapptppts19s4s@4ax.com> References: <663d5a8d$0$6426$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1jpug$v3os$1@dont-email.me> <663d70a8$0$8494$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1lke7$1fduo$3@dont-email.me> <663ea95d$1$6436$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1mgar$1lg4d$2@dont-email.me> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1715393577 reader.netnews.com 2363140 127.0.0.1:56093 Bytes: 2098 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >On 10 May 2024 23:10:21 GMT, Andrzej Matuch wrote: > >> My 11 Pro license is really just a 10 Pro one. > >Interesting. I can’t see anything in the EULA that actually permits >such a thing ><https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/UseTerms/Retail/Windows/11/UseTerms_Retail_Windows_11_English.htm>. >Note the part where Microsoft reserves “all rights (such as rights >under intellectual property laws) not expressly granted in this >agreement and no other rights are licensed to you”. A 10 key will work to install 11. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.