Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<o0lt3jlg3pcl5kpbo20bdapptppts19s4s@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=1R9W56\QFIJ9E:6N@`X^6NHWonT5<]0TMdjI?Uho:XeKlL51CP6LDLLZ1\1M:\WK>OPSm;@mReFaKioUcdMXCl[@^FQ5RF68;VGZR9b9UKd@N@
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 10 Pro, $5 USD, Still Ripoff
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 22:12:57 -0400
Message-ID: <o0lt3jlg3pcl5kpbo20bdapptppts19s4s@4ax.com>
References: <663d5a8d$0$6426$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1jpug$v3os$1@dont-email.me> <663d70a8$0$8494$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1lke7$1fduo$3@dont-email.me> <663ea95d$1$6436$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1mgar$1lg4d$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 30
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1715393577 reader.netnews.com 2363140 127.0.0.1:56093
Bytes: 2098

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On 10 May 2024 23:10:21 GMT, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
>> My 11 Pro license is really just a 10 Pro one.
>
>Interesting. I can’t see anything in the EULA that actually permits
>such a thing
><https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/UseTerms/Retail/Windows/11/UseTerms_Retail_Windows_11_English.htm>.
>Note the part where Microsoft reserves “all rights (such as rights
>under intellectual property laws) not expressly granted in this
>agreement and no other rights are licensed to you”.


A 10 key will work to install 11.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.