Path: ...!s1-1.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=o]ZeM\>jK=B756^8Dnlf4GHWonT5<]0TMdjI?Uho:XeKlL51CP6LDLL95GMl]75=8ASC9a19>SYcK7@<I4Rf8bAAl3[[dIf;_mF2Do^b@=QS7G
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 13:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <o2re5jtqvolq3oj4jv4auq2aiu880daioj@4ax.com>
References: <66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me> <v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me> <slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me> <slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <IOm5O.49633$In22.32827@fx11.iad> <v35prm$qao6$5@dont-email.me> <iGE5O.17294$8CY1.8937@fx37.iad> <lbp3crF1dt1U4@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 32
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1717005453 reader.netnews.com 2363149 127.0.0.1:35193
Bytes: 2526

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 29 May 2024 07:52:47 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
>> How does Cinnamon's decision to revert to looking like Windows 95 make
>> Linux desktop environments look good? How does XFCE continuing to poorly
>> imitate Windows 95 make Linux environments look good? How does almost
>> every desktop environment in Linux using a start button like Windows 95
>> demonstrate how innovate Linux developers are?
>
>When you've got a good thing, stick with it. The Ubuntu 22.04 'Show 
>Applications' buttin is a little too metro for me. 


No one has ever improved on the Win95 type of UI, that I've ever seen,
they might look "cooler", or something, but functional-wise, not
really.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.