| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 07:33:15 +0000 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.west.earthlink.net:119 From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Subject: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Organization: wokiesux Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 02:33:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 38 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-P3iae5SVaI54ZINX2ZFO153IgyIa+GZtwJjVm+DNDI1EYT0SfT+U0NbvgYan1WgHBHb1ZBxbBmdUZ4y!YFfaZCvUAb4Qa0SM1Mt0mU6ws/270sMOMSJ8DPyzCVndeNKDF5dfHCAtl4sfKIYpS/0baHGbFm7V!6nrXXUCyNrWoSruSBi1Y X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2268 Latter 70s they were The Thing. Needed a 64/128 processor in an 8-bit world, then bit-slice processors were yer fix. They were the basics of a CPU - but wired so you could physically attach them to MORE processors. All the necessary flags/registers/etc could be expanded wider and wider. You could buy 2-bit, 4-bit, slice processors and physically build something much stronger. I even remember hearing of them mentioned in some cheap TV series - some geek with his own R2D2 clone that was WAY too capable for the era. TODAY ... well ... you can make a 64/128 on like a 1cm die - really party on a 2cm die. Bit-slice now - you'd loose far too much in the interface wiring. Really no longer a solution - unless maybe you need a 1024/2048 processor :-) Kinda the same goes for 'Transputers' - parallel solution using ultra-speed (for the day) serial links between many processors to coordinate things between all the chips (they could have a shared memory area too). Older tech limitations spawned FIXES ... there were many. Some were very *clever* - might even have future apps. -- 033-33