Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:14:11 +0000
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:14:11 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails
 at atomiic level.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <0d509b1635259917c7b4407251adcf31@www.novabbs.com>
 <3a42db544af628ec3969d6b80f1122b7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e613885e553df4e05738929b0c9eb9a9@www.novabbs.com>
 <99a0b6f82daafa4c7f7db42b177c6415@www.novabbs.com>
 <67994a44$0$407$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <67994a44$0$407$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <oJydnV47eYWuBDT6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 19
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Y1oKcLO6FRmrBknmnbaaK1NYp4t83RFzVqGnNd7hZhQqFPthF0Bf10OQr/B+7l1cltIoSznqr0Y8nwi!ALp05Cu/mRSxKklK4byan8e/QcvsEsWjFIGPA4KJ259EWC0g0Duit3XD2FyFcsXRh3jsTWB9RQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2019

On 1/28/25 3:21 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>> QUESTION: Does relativity breaks down at atomic level?
>> Regarding Special Relativity, DeepSeek agreed that non-relativistic
>> quantum mechanics is MUCH MORE RELEVANT than the Dirac's model.
>> Schrodinger's theory reigns in most cases and is much more simple to use
>> than Dirac's.
> 
> Correct, to lowest order.

Well, sort of (see below).

> Spin can be handled by Pauli. (to lowest order)

Not really. The math of spin is the irreducible representations of the 
Lorentz group -- that's inherently SR.

Tom Roberts