Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <ocoOv-sbOrp9R1DO0R-D7ujMqYw@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp>
 <17faa49512686a50$121042$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <bbOvLVaszxKOTWdC5gXr85BZuj0@jntp>
 <17faa667df3a78bf$127943$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: ljDmFYn0hHgtSqn78PvWv0Scgc0
JNTP-ThreadID: 17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=ocoOv-sbOrp9R1DO0R-D7ujMqYw@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 24 13:48:41 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="21b58e961d0157c9c18526249011e260673fa78a"; logging-data="2024-10-02T13:48:41Z/9045137"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid>
Bytes: 3186
Lines: 54

Le 02/10/2024 à 15:39, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 15:16, Python pisze:
>> Le 02/10/2024 à 15:06, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 14:13, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 02/10/2024 à 11:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>>>>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>>>>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>>>>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>>>>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
>>>>> solar system is measuring the length
>>>>> of solar day. What is the result predicted
>>>>> by the Einsteinian physics?
>>>>> One prediction is - 99766. From the
>>>>> postulates. The second prediction is -
>>>>> 86400. From definition.
>>>>> And similiarly with the prediction of
>>>>> a measurement of a meridian.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your attention, poor
>>>>> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
>>>>
>>>> Already answered.
>>>
>>> Sure - with screaming "NOOOO!!!",
>>> wild, idiotic assertions, insults and
>>> slanders.
>> 
>> Not at all. With sensible answers
> 
> You mean that wild concept that "Earth"
> must (sic) mean a gedanken copy of Earth
> immobile wrt observer?
> Or maybe that [snip slander] assertion that the
> physics theories can't depend on unit
> definitions - 

Yes. Both.

> against the proof that they do?

There is no such "proof".

> poor stinker, fellow idiot, brainwashed religious maniac
> screaming "NOOOO!!!", insulting and slandering 

Nice signature Wozniak.