Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<odqdnVX3uO3jjrH6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 01:10:22 +0000
Subject: Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com>
 <gpSdnQefTM3Ae7b6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <beda86334a45a07f3aa7a202f7e1a8c1@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:10:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <beda86334a45a07f3aa7a202f7e1a8c1@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <odqdnVX3uO3jjrH6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-aFXFXuuD1+or8luUSZSlGB6BMQqx3TaWoTGXNGiS3ee9FUvwFhcrEW4NFxBYOU3zTVXXHNWz6fdSxA4!xsdvRNnEZbC8Lm9SNoK+KsTYiU1yk5py4LDb1wMMOVpC2pOUeOkUq/C7OVGz4lFjJ0nrs6/E2Drs
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3096

On 11/06/2024 03:20 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Ross: Well, thanks, but then Einstein is spouting gibberish because you
> must be taken to be saying Einstein claimed time dilation is caused by
> "spatial." In any case, all of it is stupid and ignorant pseudoscience
> that you retail in your gibberish or Einstein's gibberish. Ross, come
> out of it!!! Come to your senses.

It's appreciated to be sensible, yet it's length-contraction &
time-dilation only together what make space-contraction, and
clocks only slow or meet, that FitzGerald is to whom is
accredited space-contraction, who also has a lot going on
with the relation to the electromagnetic developments of
Faraday, Heaviside, Larmor, and Maxwell, then as with regards
to SR-ians and GR-ians that Einstein resulted a GR-ian like
other sensible people.

See, this still can make for a theory where the linear is
yet Galilean as its own Lorentzian with "frame-dragging"
being real enough the space-frames and frame-spaces,
and the "turning worlds" those where all things orbit
each other as much as track the geodesy - which of course
is undefined its curvature per Space-Time at all and
"is what it is", in GR - that massy bodies are mostly space -
then while also the rotational is the more usually Lorentzian,
and its SR-ian magnetic moments are as so associated with
it that way, the space-contraction is in it, as with regards
to notions of DesCartes and Kelvin the vorticial, the,
"un-linear", with regards to the linear.

Which is always nominally non-zero, ....

So, this speaks to some of what you note as perceived deficiencies
in the theory, while making a better one - of course the mathematics
has its own work to do to get improved when 0 m/s = infinity s/m.