| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<omvf4kdlt1j2lupt4osuv6i2d6oarp5cgl@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John B. <jbslocomb@fictitious.site> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees: Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:59:07 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <omvf4kdlt1j2lupt4osuv6i2d6oarp5cgl@4ax.com> References: <10204bo$2javi$4@dont-email.me> <1020f1h$2pd7f$3@dont-email.me> <1022rae$3jak1$2@dont-email.me> <10244ju$3s1io$4@dont-email.me> <10247qm$3svis$2@dont-email.me> <1024cm2$3u4uq$1@dont-email.me> <10256um$4dts$1@dont-email.me> <1025982$4pr1$3@dont-email.me> <1025ns1$bdcs$4@dont-email.me> <1026bcg$330rl$10@dont-email.me> <1026upd$jv4p$1@dont-email.me> <4r0e4kla3n7ppmqmklnbav1ng9eql9lc12@4ax.com> <1027gin$oc0i$2@dont-email.me> <1028soi$330rl$11@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:22:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="14bbb0abb533b936c9cd678dcc932753"; logging-data="1260711"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/61EQTQnlFTQtHJvp0W7D4RIwSpl7SXWw=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212 Cancel-Lock: sha1:cB7YHsf3ZZuXFQUCqoESOvwBYvw= On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 05:09:37 -0400, zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/9/2025 11:56 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote: >>> >>> One has to wonder why the Democrats are so opposed to efforts to >>> ensure that the only votes cast are from people who are qualified to >>> vote ... >> > >They aren't, dumbass. They're against the false trope that there was >widespread fraud. They're against the the lies that large numbers of >unqualified individuals cast votes. They're against the demonization and >assaults on the character of people who honestly worked their polling >places with integrity and certified election results to a result that >the magatards didn't like. > >Elections in the the US are free and fair, with minimal cases of fraud. >The vast majority of ineligible votes cast are the result of >administrative errors and mistakes. The remainder are so small as to >constitute an insignificant blip in the statistical noise. > >When you want to enact legislation based on lies, you're doing it wrong. Re elections, etc. Years ago when I lived in the U.S. I believe that there was a limit on the amount of money that an organization or individual could give to support a political party running in an election Seemed logical... rich folks couldn't dominate the party. Now I read that the president's ex buddy was the largest contributor - millions of dollars. My memory is fealty? Or they changed the rules? -- cheers, John B.