Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<omvf4kdlt1j2lupt4osuv6i2d6oarp5cgl@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John B. <jbslocomb@fictitious.site>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:59:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <omvf4kdlt1j2lupt4osuv6i2d6oarp5cgl@4ax.com>
References: <10204bo$2javi$4@dont-email.me> <1020f1h$2pd7f$3@dont-email.me> <1022rae$3jak1$2@dont-email.me> <10244ju$3s1io$4@dont-email.me> <10247qm$3svis$2@dont-email.me> <1024cm2$3u4uq$1@dont-email.me> <10256um$4dts$1@dont-email.me> <1025982$4pr1$3@dont-email.me> <1025ns1$bdcs$4@dont-email.me> <1026bcg$330rl$10@dont-email.me> <1026upd$jv4p$1@dont-email.me> <4r0e4kla3n7ppmqmklnbav1ng9eql9lc12@4ax.com> <1027gin$oc0i$2@dont-email.me> <1028soi$330rl$11@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="14bbb0abb533b936c9cd678dcc932753";
	logging-data="1260711"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/61EQTQnlFTQtHJvp0W7D4RIwSpl7SXWw="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cB7YHsf3ZZuXFQUCqoESOvwBYvw=

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 05:09:37 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> On 6/9/2025 11:56 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>
>>> One has to wonder why the Democrats are so opposed to efforts to
>>> ensure that the only votes cast are from people who are qualified to
>>> vote ...
>> 
>
>They aren't, dumbass. They're against the false trope that there was 
>widespread fraud. They're against the the lies that large numbers of 
>unqualified individuals cast votes. They're against the demonization and 
>assaults on the character of people who honestly worked their polling 
>places with integrity and certified election results to a result that 
>the magatards didn't like.
>
>Elections in the the US are free and fair, with minimal cases of fraud. 
>The vast majority of ineligible votes cast are the result of 
>administrative errors and mistakes. The remainder are so small as to 
>constitute an insignificant blip in the statistical noise.
>
>When you want to enact legislation based on lies, you're doing it wrong.


Re elections, etc.

Years ago when I lived in the U.S. I believe that there was a limit on
the amount of money that an organization or individual could give to
support a political party running in an election   
Seemed logical... rich folks couldn't dominate the party.

Now I read that the president's ex buddy was the largest contributor -
millions of dollars.

My memory is fealty? Or they changed the rules?

--
cheers,

John B.