| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<op.2nbskln4byq249@pvr2.lan> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: google antitrust trial Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 11:18:11 +1000 Lines: 75 Message-ID: <op.2nbskln4byq249@pvr2.lan> References: <v167bf$pnd$1@solani.org> <v169go$1dl1l$1@dont-email.me> <v16pr7$27se$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v16to4$1lafn$3@dont-email.me> <op.2m98kurxbyq249@pvr2.lan> <v175b1$1mmg1$1@dont-email.me> <op.2nadm2e0byq249@pvr2.lan> <v18cuh$1v29t$2@dont-email.me> <op.2na73mlgbyq249@pvr2.lan> <v18hsr$204qg$1@dont-email.me> <op.2na96yy3byq249@pvr2.lan> <v18ktd$20qmq$1@dont-email.me> <op.2nbem6h9byq249@pvr2.lan> <v18tu8$230e1$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Trace: individual.net l1aoTlu0Rj0CUhoRtv0IWAWgE5V9mL1StteemCLwslz90kL2I= Cancel-Lock: sha1:7a1L5MWkai/ZZ4olyq0O4xJwUYM= sha256:TmO5Cb6mrocHF8P0zwOZe3TKM56EyfEb8Y9KRF84oNg= User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Bytes: 3601 On Mon, 06 May 2024 07:32:56 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > On 2024-05-05 13:17, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:58:53 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2024-05-05 11:41, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:07:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2024-05-05 10:56, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 06 May 2024 02:42:56 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:= >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 23:58, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 05 May 2024 15:26:57 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrot= e: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 22:08, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 05 May 2024 13:17:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> = >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 19:10, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hank Rogers wrote on Sat, 4 May 2024 16:32:03 -0500 : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely the same people here who were defending Apple=E2=80= =99s = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> business model will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> come to Google=E2=80=99s defense now too=E2=80=A6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google will get off with a slap on the wrist. Maybe they'l= l = >>>>>>>>>>>>> later buy apple >>>>>>>>>>>>> and increase their presence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The two cults will merge their churches. >>>>>>>>>>>> Both Google and Apple stretch the laws, which is why both = = >>>>>>>>>>>> lose so many >>>>>>>>>>>> lawsuits; but what's different is nobody defends Google to = = >>>>>>>>>>>> the death. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Apple hasn't lost any lawsuits. >>>>>>>>>> Yes it has, most obviously with intellectual >>>>>>>>>> property lawsuits and tax lawsuits. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cite one. >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.' >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc.> >>>>> >>>>> You might want to look at how many suits that article shows Apple = = >>>>> lost... >>>> Nope, that's what I was saying all along, >> >>> Read it again. >> No need. > > So you think. > >> Pity about >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co. >> and yes you need to manually add the . in the browser box again > > Pity about you not understanding what the issue is... You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag, liar.