Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <ozaL8QC8SzBmz3Q43kJyx4bkO7U@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Division of two complex numbers
References: <zMjaMvWZUkHX6SOb195JTQnVpSA@jntp> <XmWkVwNVTy8QHqeS0TsrPZNuk_c@jntp> <vmmden$3e97a$1@dont-email.me>
 <GKkg17e0FiGdEqKCQvNrtvN0OLY@jntp> <vmmdso$3e97a$2@dont-email.me> <q-ufmQf4sCFn4XF8BtUedW5gSA8@jntp>
 <vmmf64$3e97a$3@dont-email.me> <vmmfk9$3emg6$2@dont-email.me> <vmmg8s$3e97a$5@dont-email.me>
 <vmmgg5$3f4ok$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: uIlGEDl1AsozGs68xHmvpSbkNwY
JNTP-ThreadID: EDRXv_p0dplN4woC0vmk_fQazIU
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=ozaL8QC8SzBmz3Q43kJyx4bkO7U@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 25 21:52:03 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="7a226b0f6c2d664790534afd7e847737d5df5486"; logging-data="2025-01-20T21:52:03Z/9181456"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2740
Lines: 41

Le 20/01/2025 à 22:51, Moebius a écrit :
> Am 20.01.2025 um 22:47 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>> On 1/20/2025 1:36 PM, Moebius wrote:
>>> Am 20.01.2025 um 22:28 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>>>> On 1/20/2025 1:09 PM, Python wrote:
> 
>>> Note though:
>>>
>>>>>>> This is quite off-topic to point out that multiplication of 
>>>>>>> complex numbers in C/C++ can be done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The discussion is not about that it can be done, even crank Hachel 
>>>>>>> would admit this. It is *why* it makes sense to define 
>>>>>>> multiplication *that way*.
>>>
>>> See?!
>>>
>>> Your C code doesn't answer the latter "question".
>> 
>> Sorry for missing something here. The division of complex numbers?
> 
> You are missing what Python told you:
> 
>       The  discussion is not about that it can be done, even crank Hachel
>       would admit this. It is *why* it makes sense to define
>       multiplication *that way* [i.e the usualy way --Moebius].
> 
> Again:
> 
>        Hachel didn't write that it cannot be done (he's not that silly),
>        he claimed (wrongly) that it is the wrong way to define
>        multiplication between complex numbers.
> 
> See?!
> 
> .
> .
> .

Maybe autistic syndrome?