| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<p5lghjhh1vsnqa6ljm65bk43r1papp7itm@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The Joy Of Democracy Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:45:32 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <p5lghjhh1vsnqa6ljm65bk43r1papp7itm@4ax.com> References: <ll34utF2sr2U2@mid.individual.net> <lapoejdcdavfk9afj57ft0onn7st0se8dr@4ax.com> <ll39uoF3k5nU2@mid.individual.net> <m1toej53l5p8c417540flbg42vaqi1apjo@4ax.com> <vf6um5$15nlq$6@dont-email.me> <ClDRO.423798$FzW1.157455@fx14.iad> <vf7ah3$1b8kc$2@dont-email.me> <lnp1esF62r3U5@mid.individual.net> <2pkehjtui09t0e69ir03bl0fdk861hnj9c@4ax.com> <lnq529Fbi4gU2@mid.individual.net> <0rgghj5reoqn4qm6nr5hpbv6f90mf4b0dh@4ax.com> <lnr203Ffh95U7@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 03:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="40da2354930c5a8704f5b651b70ef804"; logging-data="1828576"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197i1d3ed+H4+4gDSrgC3C2y74GKQ9FZZM=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:i0vG0inMm606XrRxlhBnhjL9Hz4= OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 3544 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>> I'm pretty sure she [Vice Pres. Harris] would've won the [2024 Democratic Party] primaries, had they been open. >>>> She's not what the naysayers so casually observe her to be, she's >>>> intelligent and experienced as the incumbent vice president. >>> >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries >>> >>>They were open. She was not a candidate. Biden was rubber-stamped >>>despite low approval ratings and increasingly evident senility. Sometime >>>between the close of the primaries in June and July 21 the Democrats >>>noticed Biden's problems. >> >> What other serious contenders were there, than Biden (and Harris by >> being his running mate)? > >I am not responsible for the machinations of the DNC. Bernie got screwed >twice so he wasn't likely to try for three. Kennedy saw the writing on the >wall and went independent. I don't know if Williamson was even serious but >she didn't last long, nor did Phillips. Palmer (who?) won Samoa over >Biden. Did every Democratic governor, senator, and representative get the >memo that Biden was the selection and they shouldn't waste their time? > >At least the Republicans had DeSantis, Haley, and Ramaswamy. The first two >were credible. Ramaswamy is too much a pharma bro for my taste to say >nothing of being apolitical until jumping in. > > >That's the best the US can do? 330+ million people and that's it? Well, that's an interesting point, but ultimately the Republicans went with DJT, and the Democrats went with the current VP. It makes sense, if a bit out of the ordinary. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.