Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers
References: <kRgli3QEdimCvJ9569p9c9pq7Kc@jntp> <vqemhv$2gck$1@news.muc.de> <h8RR2Nzw97n_q0rv1uxcQeGImmk@jntp>
 <vqes0t$2mbh$1@news.muc.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: Ea2FdL5ANBrlWCvn3PPh1cK_Xnk
JNTP-ThreadID: c6gHfjF1zb3jexYtsO4J-uwTdUA
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 25 17:54:05 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-03-07T17:54:05Z/9233723"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2215
Lines: 31

Le 07/03/2025 à 14:23, Alan Mackenzie a écrit :
> Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote:

>>>> Exemple : Roots of f(x)=x²+4x+5 ---> x'=i, x"=-5i
> 
>>> Wrong.

 It's false for you, it's true for me.

It all depends on the point of view, and how we conceive of complex roots 
and the idea we have of the imaginary i.
 
>>>> Finally, the complex roots of a function are the real roots of the 
>>>> function in point symmetry $(0,y), and vice versa.
> 
>>> That's meaningless gibberish.

On the contrary, it is very clear, mathematically coherent, and very 
elegant as a development.

>> For those who are more open-minded and less stupid than Alan:
> 
> Is that all you've got?  Ad hominem attacks?

 Not realy. 

> You are a troll and a crank, devoid of basic education in maths.

 Ad hominem attack.

R.H.