| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers References: <kRgli3QEdimCvJ9569p9c9pq7Kc@jntp> <vqemhv$2gck$1@news.muc.de> <h8RR2Nzw97n_q0rv1uxcQeGImmk@jntp> <vqes0t$2mbh$1@news.muc.de> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: Ea2FdL5ANBrlWCvn3PPh1cK_Xnk JNTP-ThreadID: c6gHfjF1zb3jexYtsO4J-uwTdUA JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=pAkmrvSqwU-d6hwbg0Tyx4zET-8@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 07 Mar 25 17:54:05 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-03-07T17:54:05Z/9233723"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> Bytes: 2215 Lines: 31 Le 07/03/2025 à 14:23, Alan Mackenzie a écrit : > Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> wrote: >>>> Exemple : Roots of f(x)=x²+4x+5 ---> x'=i, x"=-5i > >>> Wrong. It's false for you, it's true for me. It all depends on the point of view, and how we conceive of complex roots and the idea we have of the imaginary i. >>>> Finally, the complex roots of a function are the real roots of the >>>> function in point symmetry $(0,y), and vice versa. > >>> That's meaningless gibberish. On the contrary, it is very clear, mathematically coherent, and very elegant as a development. >> For those who are more open-minded and less stupid than Alan: > > Is that all you've got? Ad hominem attacks? Not realy. > You are a troll and a crank, devoid of basic education in maths. Ad hominem attack. R.H.