Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<pan$12f0c$b8055f7b$e138cd3a$8c4aa277@linux.rocks> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> Subject: Why GIMP Is Better Than Photoshop Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <pan$12f0c$b8055f7b$e138cd3a$8c4aa277@linux.rocks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 21 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:56:23 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:56:23 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1092 Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Bytes: 1411 Photoshop, the name that hangs on every lackey asshole's lips, is actually severely limited in its bit depths. Photoshop, as well as other commercial garbage, only allows processing in 8, 16, or 32-bit (integer) depths. The mighty GIMP, otoh, offers 6, 16, 32-bit integer as well as 16 and 32-bit floating point and this is a HUGE difference in modern, cutting-edge processing. If you don't what all of this means then get out. You belong to the Photoshop idiot crowd. Photoshop is for brain-dead assholes. The GIMP is for creative innovators with the intelligence to match. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.