Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Good glass
Date: 9 Jun 2025 09:41:58 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <pan$87969$f440eafe$199e227c$de9b6baf@gmail.com>
References: <pan$57084$1a42e2bd$6ee302ee$3a1bf35c@gmail.com>
	<pan$40c27$80c6e848$2697f815$b1c4d553@gmail.com>
	<1024l00$3vlcp$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net +Y2gGHL3fHPuPCQAHJ6wvALpWvJbxLjLpUleqbU4Hfpz678C8=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z89u8M5tGCNkNpFmfJVwS0mwtFc= sha256:2AnVfUm/pnV4IatIcyTAZ2Lj+GjZgdn2NGiPw++MP+c=
User-Agent: Pan/0.147 (Sweet Solitude; 97d1711 github.com/GNOME/pan.git)

El Sun, 08 Jun 2025 13:32:32 -0500, Bill W escribió:

>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/wibbleypants/albums/72177720326695050/
> 
> Photo 1956 baffled me, so I had to google stuff. Now I know that the
> farther the camera is from the focus point, the wider the DOF, so I’m
> guessing that the camera was farther from the focus point in that photo
> than the other two f1.8 photos.


The focus was the same in both - the green bit of the palm. It was me that 
moved. The depth of field scale on the lens doesn't go bigger than f4. So 
there should be no DoF at all.


-- 
Paul.

https://paulc.es