From: Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks>
Subject: Re: Kernel 6.12
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <pan$7b34a$7aafbe7a$e0d66c56$b4ab3a8b@linux.rocks> <lq4ng6Fb9u9U1@mid.individual.net> <pan$ce7dc$e12054e5$d4056dec$377ef775@linux.rocks> <6741b9a6$0$541$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <pan$922e2$dadcf749$e35a5686$709c4389@linux.rocks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 41
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-2.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:56:03 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:56:03 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1849
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com
Bytes: 2105

On 23 Nov 2024 11:16:54 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
> It was important to do years ago, it's useless now. Except if you want
> to have issues with some drivers, there is no need to do it. For a
> normal desktop I mean. Some usages can require it, but it's very rare. I
> wouldn't consider a distro who requires me to compile anything to be
> serious. It's a useless waste of time and ressources. On an embedded
> device, sure it's important, but not on a desktop.
> 

Says who?  Says YOU?

You are NOT an expert -- not even close.  The above comment
is just your ignorant and confused OPINION.

However, _I_ am the expert, and when _I_ say it is best
to build the kernel then it is best.


> 
> You needed two and a half minutes, to do it, yes. So, when a new kernel
> comes out, it comes with new options. Which have defaults. And the only
> possibility to update your kernel in two minutes and thirty seconds is
> to let the defaults.
>

Wrong yet again, retard.

Using "make oldconfig" I can set all new options in less than
30 seconds.

You always object because you are JEALOUS.  You wish that you
could do the same but you cannot.





-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.