From: Diego Garcia <dg@linux.rocks>
Subject: Re: obs-studio, vlc
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <lo39seFn5f2U2@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <pan$9cfab$85c96c4$ca1df43a$3b0de05c@linux.rocks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 16
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:42:43 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:42:43 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 874
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com

On 26 Oct 2024 04:35:26 GMT, vallor wrote:

> obs-studio and vlc are two successful open source projects.
> 

That is not strictly true.

Both of the above are merely GUI wrappers around fundamental
FOSS libraries and utilities such as ffmpeg.

The true successes are these fundamental libraries.

Ffmpeg, for example, literally rules the video world.
Absolutely no one wants anything from Microslop.