Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charles Packer <mailbox@cpacker.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Can CHATGPT or Google Gemini write Sci-fi
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 07:57:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <pan$a9c6$2a65d985$982c89a0$3de04d03@cpacker.org>
References: <vdpve8$27f4$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>
	<lmblmkF88r2U1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 09:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d03bf2573a35991c67cc03704633a48a";
	logging-data="727861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+facDBODaStGu3Wyg3Fhcy"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+MOnKL3Sx153TDVknXHmBDx+dng=
Bytes: 1711

On 5 Oct 2024 02:13:40 GMT, Chris Buckley wrote:

> On 2024-10-04, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> A question for discussion.
> 
> It's bee happening for a couple of years already. Why should it stop now
> that the AI is better?
> 
> NY Times 2/23/2023
>   And now, it seems, it's happening in real life. The editors of three
>   science fiction magazines — Clarkesworld, The Magazine of Fantasy &
>   Science Fiction, and Asimov's Science Fiction — said this week that
>   they had been flooded by submissions of works of fiction generated by
>   A.I. chatbots.
> 
> Chris

A tandem question might be posed: has human-written SF declined in quality
precipitously since the start of the 21st century?