Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<pan$bb5a3$9945b524$e24df187$e4a83bac@invalid.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!bluemanedhawk.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:28:51 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <pan$bb5a3$9945b524$e24df187$e4a83bac@invalid.invalid> References: <afdfe7c37c6ad739fd82c7ec0587b82e0963fce2@i2pn2.org> <va3n09$3nnl8$1@dont-email.me> <f693bfded5f8fec712a445d88ebe34419e0f7072@i2pn2.org> <vajt3u$2so1b$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:28:51 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: bluemanedhawk.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8249f32cd12d0856e1d868ef4a71083f"; logging-data="3140866"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19AeTKqXGEPoU/LP9c7HewNNs9H+74sPFU=" User-Agent: Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5KrGH2lV6N08qKUmBwiRR7tS+vE= X-Face: Taumatawhakatangihangakoauauotamateaturipukakapikimaungahoronuku pokaiwhenuakitanatahu Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAIAAADYYG7QAAACh0lEQVRYw71Z21bD MAzzevbfkr4cHjrSXJyL044+MDa6WLEl2SkvkrZ1AbAvXO+bUGSCPYnsuIVGMpm ZLnjX718GhAKNsp8lON2F9VrhELwIgJlBepkZjA78rVK+FkmNhEJK76UsJlz8+E rJsjrpYouhLo/SC6qPHgakFOR8wV9+8rCfO/I/oVnmUZUp42/LW2XkLj9TCFNM9 jp5g2EmHZgpYZjCOkYU7sXVogRylJqpdggoFLG1g09Flah/7kErCxzR9HgXPYsq 0glb9cxjIz2Vsk9AmAoCSxECpD713joMKjQqLAtmMqJmXjdVvlMnMQCVITotJd1 z+fh1f1NNo+vuc1KnhWUmY7t03vydTud9BbXCtN3L2PL3bK7JCNG0GHzuZxafyB fxevCxpm1vrwZltqw6SILCcdoCE6PGQC8wZWDA9Or7Qp5s3lAZezys0nDazs9S9 R0TjwEiksRxLkNPC1NMMWPs1bj0Ei0Yuo+JVtFLuzP1NRJ16qXWN8DhhtmS4PDg O6mqRxs4bEJrYt087mSIow/1VzW2oFlMQuiuIy/KsUagvhdw6hSjJGlIavbLF8x j3X47bccLcUSi0dkWh1nUZNhANT1tHKUXrNxNLbd9KPb9wDDVrKwmPQMOPQ1oy6 k5I1DwzDeRJd3jVIhDAUxq3ngzJG4CCkNXZxZVMcjefoK2J0gUY2S3rxz/RuTFx 2zHd9U+obimJXMG4edsk/2j5pTU5G1MmzbRLxkfq5EiT1GGsidvMGzi+1goGb2l GCrN+nGnV8xj3q3JLRDVPL96vUc7Z4aJ3TN1mVqWAMJMfG+Jxh6TQqP+92iZkCU xtglds1AB6r0aiSHKcnFck+p/c/0CbacFLQcajGcAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Bytes: 3231 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:40:39 +0200, fir wrote: > >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> Somehow along the line from BCPL to B to C, one useful feature was >>> lost: the ability to have a value-returning statement block inside an >>> expression. >>> >> if so thats probably sad, though i dont know how it looked like > > The construct looks like > > VALOF $( ... «stmts»; RESULTIS «return-value» $) So a la GNUC's statement-expressions? I've heard talks that C2y is likely to be the revision that adds lambdas to C¹, so perhaps we'll get it back… over half a century later. ⸻ ¹In addition to subsuming statement-expressions, this would also subsume multiple other extensions, particularly GCC's local functions and Clang's Blocks. -- Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/blu.mɛin.dʰak/│he/him/his/himself/Mr. blue-maned_hawk.srht.site BSD made an attempt to standardize this. It didn't work.