Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<pan$c184e$6006bc52$d9c37a3b$bc6393b9@cpacker.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charles Packer <mailbox@cpacker.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Books Banned in Utah.
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 07:45:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <pan$c184e$6006bc52$d9c37a3b$bc6393b9@cpacker.org>
References: <v90pgc$3clah$1@dont-email.me>
	<pan$cc65f$b383958e$45a7f8cd$8216c426@cpacker.org>
	<eg2fbjts1tdlmsvqoda3vhu5ghguib7vlo@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 09:45:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91668732908a64109cd2390a79dbd6e5";
	logging-data="2312420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+AehHVXJNFoKXe46uflrY"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:72q1ZD7zEKewQFduvCgqUvmcN3Q=
Bytes: 3229

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 08:46:03 -0700, Paul S Person wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 07:55:11 -0000 (UTC), Charles Packer
> <mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:38:20 +1200, Titus G wrote:
>>
>>> Utah has banned 13 books, including Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood
>>> which basically claims that large corporations are not to be trusted
>>> with science.
>>> I do not know any of the other authors but Sarah J. Maas writes
>>> Fantasy.
>>> James Nichol will be delighted that women are being recognised with
>>> twelve of the thirteen books being written by women.
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/e/
>>2PACX-1vQc_7uakPh4eRXrq0iVq-L2g-BwcnRWyfc7E0QOdrThoUEtPHQaDvJM4JwNFXV-
>>HZQok4L-fDh_P9jt/pubhtml?pli=1
>>
>>Is nobody simply curious as to why different books have different sets
>>of school boards banning them? And how many school districts are there
>>in Utah, anyway? How can we be sure that this isn't a publicity stunt
>>for Sarah J Maas?
> 
> Different school boards have different values. That's the problem with
> "local values" -- they are /local/. Go over the ridge to the next school
> district and the values may differ. Hence the endless attempts to
> elevate /my/ local values to apply /universally/. Well, not mine
> personally, of course; I am indicating the state of mind of the
> individual(s) doing the banning.
> 
> I saw an article recently that claimed that most book banning efforts
> were being done, country-wide, by at most 11 distinct people. I wonder
> how many distinct people were responsible for the thousands of
> voicemails/emails to election workers who had the gall to insist that
> the vote count determined the winner -- one? two? three?.

Subsequently the New York Times ran a story that resolved my
puzzlement over the structure of the list. If at least three
school districts decide to ban a book, all school districts
in the state are required to remove it from their libraries.
I looked up the locations of each of the five districts
appearing in the list and they're all in small towns.
Fun fact: Utah spends the least of any state on its public
schools, on a per pupil basis.