Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<pan$cc206$666a7ee5$9c599643$77173a6a@linux.rocks> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> Subject: Anyone Using OpenZFS? Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <pan$cc206$666a7ee5$9c599643$77173a6a@linux.rocks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 20 Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:48:37 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:48:37 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1099 Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Bytes: 1417 I hear a lot about the virtues of OpenZFS, which is available for GNU/Linux albeit, due to license concerns, only in a roundabout way. A separate external module must be compiled and then added to the kernel. Since my programming predilection is HPC/scientific/engineering, I know little about disk I/O concepts. So answer these questions if you are able. Is OpenZFS suitable/recommended for a desktop workstation? What are the benefits of OpenZFS compared to EXT4? Is OpenZFS stable enough to be trusted? I will appreciate all responses. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.