Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<pan$e090f$6c8a9473$fa51b70a$799b1a1d@cpacker.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charles Packer <mailbox@cpacker.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Question about ISFDB statistic
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:00:41 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <pan$e090f$6c8a9473$fa51b70a$799b1a1d@cpacker.org>
References: <pan$3b37a$c6ff141b$56a5277c$10152fe7@cpacker.org>
	<vth0jn$3gei5$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="31d77f22f4f2ca48e9a166f65bc6cfcd";
	logging-data="842657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MoCwVS4Wiu7v2CxG+QsKI"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VdOy5hbWp/BD8NGQ8cUUpOTMoiM=
Bytes: 2248

On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:42:33 -0400, William Hyde wrote:

> Charles Packer wrote:
>> Why the wide swing in the number of titles in the ISFDB by year of
>> publication -- 50% jump -- from 1938 to 1939?
>> It's hard to believe that it reflects a step function in public
>> interest. The context is as follows:
>> 
>> year 1936 count 4738 1937  4628 1938  4117 1939  6245 1940  6685 1941 
>> 5746 1942  5513
>> 
>> 
> There was a bit of a boom in SF magazines about this time.  Unknown, for
> example, was launched in 1939 as were Startling Stories and Planet
> Stories.  I presume there were others I don't know about.
> 
> Secondary publication and reprints became more popular, as I mentioned
> elsewhere.
> 
> Pohl's two magazines at this time were launched in 1940, too late to
> account for the step function, but part of the 39-41 boom which came to
> an end due to wartime paper shortages.
> 
> William Hyde

A dip into the newpaper archives confirms what you're saying.
First, there's a lot of writing about writing in those days.
And I found easily comments about the increasing audience for
SF. I also noticed that the postwar boom coincided with the
1947 flying saucer frenzy. I suspect it's not a coincidence.