Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<pan$e090f$6c8a9473$fa51b70a$799b1a1d@cpacker.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Charles Packer <mailbox@cpacker.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Question about ISFDB statistic Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:00:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <pan$e090f$6c8a9473$fa51b70a$799b1a1d@cpacker.org> References: <pan$3b37a$c6ff141b$56a5277c$10152fe7@cpacker.org> <vth0jn$3gei5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:00:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="31d77f22f4f2ca48e9a166f65bc6cfcd"; logging-data="842657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MoCwVS4Wiu7v2CxG+QsKI" User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VdOy5hbWp/BD8NGQ8cUUpOTMoiM= Bytes: 2248 On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:42:33 -0400, William Hyde wrote: > Charles Packer wrote: >> Why the wide swing in the number of titles in the ISFDB by year of >> publication -- 50% jump -- from 1938 to 1939? >> It's hard to believe that it reflects a step function in public >> interest. The context is as follows: >> >> year 1936 count 4738 1937 4628 1938 4117 1939 6245 1940 6685 1941 >> 5746 1942 5513 >> >> > There was a bit of a boom in SF magazines about this time. Unknown, for > example, was launched in 1939 as were Startling Stories and Planet > Stories. I presume there were others I don't know about. > > Secondary publication and reprints became more popular, as I mentioned > elsewhere. > > Pohl's two magazines at this time were launched in 1940, too late to > account for the step function, but part of the 39-41 boom which came to > an end due to wartime paper shortages. > > William Hyde A dip into the newpaper archives confirms what you're saying. First, there's a lot of writing about writing in those days. And I found easily comments about the increasing audience for SF. I also noticed that the postwar boom coincided with the 1947 flying saucer frenzy. I suspect it's not a coincidence.