Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Orange One
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 19:54:19 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 100
Message-ID: <pbdagl-dml61.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <hV9WP.65398$cb1.46436@fx09.ams1>   <kg96gl-ebc01.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <224e57ec1c05fa362dcffb940726ebd7@www.novabbs.org> <ivt8gl-35c41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <adbe792914cc50c43da87f09d64d2836@www.novabbs.org> <lo29gl-9jo41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <42988bbb04d800c72420afefedeae0b1@www.novabbs.org> <kss9gl-pi161.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <47e90688fd24647ba4157601dddf1ccc@www.novabbs.org> <nlu9gl-iv361.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f07456a07a1435721e743b789b56da81@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 05:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="28a4b46c632fd0520e7a7e2b728d13ef";
	logging-data="1249297"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180kwuXyULfv1/YNfb+Rp3H"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-140-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:W4j1DQr46NrTkjR5HTNyXGgz4Xo=
Bytes: 5318

Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2025 22:43:37 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 22:13:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 14:47:19 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 13:25:40 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 May 2025 13:24:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 May 2025 13:54:24 +0000, occam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/05/2025 02:00, Arindam's bitches wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Israelis and Indians evidently know what to do about crude missile
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attacks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Short range missiles. You detect, you shoot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion so far has been on long range missiles. Not the same
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam's new design rail gun can launch missiles at supersonic speeds.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have reproduced something invented almost 200 years ago and your
>>>>>>>>>> version is capable of nothing more than rolling pipes at low speed,
>>>>>>>>>> crackpot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, not so, Pennino. Don't lie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No one invented the low voltage heavy armature electromagnetic rail gun
>>>>>>>>> design before Arindam Banerjee, who did it in 2015
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The basic principal can be traced back to the work of Charles Wheatstone
>>>>>>>> in the 1840's, crackpot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Using the principal to launch a projectile was demonstrated by André
>>>>>>>> Louis Octave Fauchon-Villeplée in 1917, crackpot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip insane rant>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are not talking old stuff here, dodgy liar. Totally irrelevant to
>>>>>>> Arindam's astounding work that is completely original. No one ever did
>>>>>>> such an experiment that by outing inertia revised the foundations of
>>>>>>> dynamics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Making a device that is bigger, smaller or slightly different is not an
>>>>>> invention, Arindam.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not slightly different, stupid lying penisnino. It is vastly
>>>>> different,
>>>>
>>>> No, it is no different in principle than models built over a hundred
>>>> years ago, crackpot. Using modern, synthetic insulated wire instead of
>>>> cloth insulated wire doesn't make it different, crackpot.
>>>
>>> Arindam used super capacitors for his experiment which were not around a
>>> century ago, fool.
>>
>> The only difference between super capacitors and what was available 100
>> years ago is the size of the capacitors for a given capacitance,
>> crackpot.
>>
>> All of which is irrelevant as electricity is electricity no matter the
>> source, crackpot.
> 
> Current amplitude and physical size matter, fool.

The maximum voltage rating for super capacitors is under 3 volts. To get
large currents, you need high voltages. A super capacitor is probably
the WORST thing you could pick to power a rail gun, crackpot, which is
why your "rail gun" does nothing more than roll a pipe very slowly.

<snip insane rant>

>>
>> By the way, crackpot, Fauchon-Villeplée patented his device (US1421435A)
>> in 1919.
> 
> Fat lot of anything that did for the failed US rail guns.

Whether or not anyone has ever made a practical rail gun is irrelevant,
crackpot.

The bottom line is the 1919 patent shows a device of identical
construction to your pipe roller and there is nothing new in your
construction, crackpot.

<snip insane rant>

-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com