| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<progress-20250608155822@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Wrong ideas about chatbots
Date: 8 Jun 2025 14:59:40 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 29
Expires: 1 Jun 2026 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <progress-20250608155822@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References: <parsing-20250608013417@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <10246l4$3smkv$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de e2fRyuys71S76Bvb40DJfADuLqhlHIIRKeZBrRdAyIEZEo
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1/Y0umB93gCv/mhwt8XPEJth81Y= sha256:E9x6p0ZNDjfsbgnAYUrfNmbfAjVzEAp22z4BGtYSASE=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2025 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2789
Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> wrote or quoted:
>You are fixating on the technical and ignoring the social. From the
>original article:
>[AI] turns social relations into number-crunching operations...
>Meredith Whittaker, president of the Signal Foundation, has
>described AI as being fundamentally "surveillance technology".
>AI systems have found their best product-market fit in police and
>military applications, where short-circuiting people's critical
>thinking and decision-making processes is incredibly useful...
It's true that for some folks, AI kind of takes the place of
real social interaction, and it can be used for things like
surveillance, law enforcement, or the military.
It's a good thing when people spot potential risks and speak
up about them.
But people really shouldn't be acting as if every social
interaction we have is now run by AI, or like those police
and military uses are all AI is good for.
You could say the same thing about all kinds of tech and scientific
progress. Take psychology, for example. There are techniques that
let you figure out someone's political leanings just from subtle word
choices. Any kind of scientific or technical breakthrough can get
twisted by bad actors, like dictators, to spy on their own people,
mess with them, or even go after other countries.