| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<psychology-20240305131516@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Re: Jonathan Swift published a proposal to regulate English (22-2-1712)
Date: 5 Mar 2024 12:15:52 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 12
Expires: 1 Feb 2025 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <psychology-20240305131516@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References: <ur9o0v$f3cj$1@dont-email.me> <877civp1ys.fsf@parhasard.net> <slrnutnodl.1anp.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <go6vakx25m.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <slrnuu4d55.2iip.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <dv2hbkxi79.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <spelling-20240305090323@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ik7jbkxb4u.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <us6vve$3o5rp$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de SyE4yc363dHArBJKIRfa9Q3/D1PF1vKV9xI1t41hHujKQq
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P0Jewb50cZix9e8l/SIgje7YOig= sha256:Vd661jO84gi06Vgn7F0K4Al+REVqt5IBxtWsP1L0r3A=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2024 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Accept-Language: de-DE-1901, en-US, it, fr-FR
Antonio Marques <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote or quoted:
>Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> wrote:
>>Mentally disturbed is something of an exaggeration. All I meant was
>>that some educated poeple are resistant to change for that reason.
>What you actually did was to add insult to injury.
And then one could just as well cite psychological mechanisms at
work on the part of some of the proponents of the new rules: If a
teacher or pupil is forced by the school to write in certain ways
that are actually bad, a cognitive dissonance arises ("I do it,
but it's bad."), which the teacher or pupil resolves by convincing
himself that this new way of writing is actually quite good.