Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <q-QEiXQ4AOKi8_NRnIlJeg9iGaI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious =?UTF-8?Q?Baubles=3F?=
References: <266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com> <679284FD.3ABB@ix.netcom.com>
 <67a111c1cd4ba39ca41fe660200ecadf@www.novabbs.com> <5e7fc5f52bd5693fabce0060ee8b91df@www.novabbs.com>
 <vmufi5$1r9fi$1@dont-email.me> <50d67245623f6116d399ab3a0a503fa7@www.novabbs.com> <2Kkb651yPZTAy2tSaYT3ZyhVM0s@jntp>
 <71934e2f2b925fe4855911df1789012a@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
JNTP-HashClient: x_9sMFu-EGtAdUTVr-evP58EGVM
JNTP-ThreadID: 266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=q-QEiXQ4AOKi8_NRnIlJeg9iGaI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 25 21:23:51 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="dc5d6b352757542993c5adf6fe0364b7d017a6bf"; logging-data="2025-01-25T21:23:51Z/9186654"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 4626
Lines: 67

Le 25/01/2025 à 22:14, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit 
:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 2:33:23 +0000, Python wrote:
> 
>> Le 24/01/2025 à 23:11, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
>> :
>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:24:04 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/23/2025 2:20 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:47:25 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>>>>>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>>>>>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>>>>>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>>>>>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>>>>>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>>>>>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and
>>>>>>>> thoughtlessly
>>>>>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>>>>>>>> slavish, and avoidable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
>>>>>>> monopoly'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The really amusing thing is that people are intellectual weaklings who
>>>>>> couldn't reason themselves out of a paper bag, or they wouldn't accept
>>>>>> curved space for a second.
>>>>> Did you ever acknowledge my point that Einstein should have understood
>>>>> that parallel lines would have to meet for space to curve? Isn't it
>>>>> stupid as hell not to recognize that? If he had been an honest and
>>>>> forthright person, he would have said we have to presume that parallel
>>>>> lines meet to claim space is curved, and this is our derivation for the
>>>>> doubling of the Newtonian deflection. Then, every reasonable person
>>>>> would have balked at such an irrational assumption and recognized him as
>>>>> a foolish fellow.
>>>>
>>>> Think of drawing two horizontal lines on a spheres surface. They will
>>>> never intersect.
>>> You presume space can be treated as a surface. That is a petitio
>>> principii. You presume it's curved to conclude it's curved. It's not a
>>> surface and its not curved.
>>
>> Your "petitio principii" is that a 3D space, or a 4D space-time can be
>> "curved" the same way a surface can be. Why that?
> What are you trying to ask or say? How can space be curved? It can't be
> curved at all. That is the reification fallacy.

Because you say so? LOL.