| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<qbvo3kpki3p700vli5o5sonr435jjq6lfo@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 12:23:04 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <qbvo3kpki3p700vli5o5sonr435jjq6lfo@4ax.com> References: <19nb3k5q4pho824jtoqf3kbrsned4n7db6@4ax.com> <1015m1m$2t1jh$1@dont-email.me> <r7ld3kpnr93qchg4qtgj8c0fl3c30s8197@4ax.com> <7stg3ktsmgruok4vhe9ano5he6itmjhkrv@4ax.com> <thug3kl02jlmnppqkcka8s7v4rk6scc8tt@4ax.com> <d397c25e65313b93d5124198ed81d23658f14cc0@i2pn2.org> <101br9k$d9mh$1@dont-email.me> <0b8ebed77c12b770bc4e71477d1594422dbf70ea@i2pn2.org> <101h4fh$1uq3b$1@dont-email.me> <oqho3k9ju5tilr34qsnolcajjorutsv2cj@4ax.com> <ptno3k59c56lfj0212c82oful6lspvopcv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:23:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="babb67913da6e10574e53af91f755d60"; logging-data="2402931"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Wzv17i3WZJwO7OLzsDScE" Cancel-Lock: sha1:phTRiDRRSELcKYvB39W0GYBPKQM= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250601-2, 6/1/2025), Outbound message X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 Bytes: 3023 Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say: >On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 08:28:53 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote: >>JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn >>spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say: > > >>>As the old joke goes, why buy a bigger TV when you can just move closer >>>to the screen. > >>Cause there's a finite limit to how many people can get closer to the >>screen. > >Plus, you'll go blind if you sit so close to the screen. Didn't you >mother teach you anything? ;-) Well with early CRT based TVs there might _possibly_ have been something to that. With LCDs and such now, I very much doubt it. >(I'm pretty sure if it were up to my mother, she'd have had me watch >TV from the other room. I wonder where the 'you'd go blind' rumor >start anyway?) Or been like my parents who bought into the whole "TV makes you stupid" thing and allowed us 1 hour of TV ... a week. Star Trek on Saturday afternoon of course. 2pm if I recall correctly, which I likely don't since it was 50+ years ago. Xocyll -- I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably, Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com