Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 07:07:56 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 103
Message-ID: <qe95tk-j5u21.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <c596f37eaeac082fce8f501ced6c4cd6@www.novabbs.com>   <rjq0tk-4dhs.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <0f163c5194ace41af71d6c5b3c9641de@www.novabbs.com> <g201tk-f2ps.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f748b62dd174a60499571fe91f87d5ba@www.novabbs.com> <uof3tk-0vk01.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <75a0474a69c10683e1a5bb4dc558eae7@www.novabbs.com> <08r3tk-0t311.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <a32ea42841dc616462284b590945ed31@www.novabbs.com> <fc54tk-u6h11.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <1b5842a777c60412c75671fd6d15645d@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 16:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6199553bdfa5ea75f003201fcecbc17e";
	logging-data="279503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3Gcq9+/5ZaY4PBDMUhmsS"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-122-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YsVU747EKZXhznHXSSuNKQnOoiI=
Bytes: 5631

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 3:52:17 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 0:59:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:43:28 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:03:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:30:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 02:51, Jim Pennino pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 9:06:50 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What follows from Arindamic physics is the permanent motion machine,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating energy indefinitely. A minor version of the workings of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe, where energy is created and disdipated in its infinite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vastness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam bets that when he makes such a machine the penisninos (they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number in billions) will still continue to abuse and ignore him. Frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and fools are like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apes being apes, ape. No matter what nonsense is spouted by beloved or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feared alpha-apes. That explains the success of relativity theories, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> incredibly ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The success of relativity theories is because every experiment since
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1905
>>>>>>>>>>>> confirms them,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, it is because some fanatic religious
>>>>>>>>>>> maniacs like yourself lie experiments
>>>>>>>>>>> confirm them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So where is your experiment with data and math that contradicts Einstein
>>>>>>>>>> or are you just yet another arm waving and babbling crackpot?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The inertia violation experiment using the new rail gun designed by
>>>>>>>>> Arindam validates Maxwellian electrodynamics and throws out
>>>>>>>>> Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics. As lack of reaction is predicted by
>>>>>>>>> F=Bil for the former and NOT by the latter where energy from current
>>>>>>>>> moves as particles in a loop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean your silly "expriment" with no data and no math Anirandam?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unlike the computer art presented as science by the esteemed e=mcc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first experimental proofs of Einstein's theories were done long
>>>>>> before there was any such thing as computer art crackpot.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no experimental proofs of Einstein's theories,
>>>>
>>>> Thousand upon thousand Arindam.
>>>
>>> Name one.
>>
>> OK, since you seem so hung up on e=mc^2 I'll start with special
>> relativity.
>>
>> Fizeau experiment
> 
> Irrelevant
> 
>> Michelson–Morley experiment
> 
> Biggest bungle in science as pointed out by Arindam in 2005.
> 
> 
>> Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments
>> Trouton–Noble experiment
>> Rayleigh and Brace experiments
>> Trouton–Rankine experiment
>> Ives–Stilwell experiment
> 
> All bollocks after the MMI bungle which shows light speed varies with
> the speed of emitter.
> 
> That bungle ked to the corruption of physics and its replacement by
> pseudo-scientific claptrap.
>>
>> That gets us to 1938.
> 
> And after that the frauds got total control with the atom bomb which was
> supposedly explained by e=mcc. Actually just fear, propaganda, math
> bull, personality cults, money power, awards, ever more nonsense with
> mathematics hocus-pocus... Arindam slaughtered them all with his kinetic
> formula relating mass and energy that is e=0.5mvvN(N-k)
> 
> Woof-woof
> 
> Bertietaylor

As would be expected, nothing but arm waving raving nonsense from the
crackpot.

Still no reproducable experiment with data and math crackpot.