Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:05:55 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <qhhbqjp3pdugvvpgnq2ea24vr3igv2bgu2@4ax.com>
References: <ke55qjll7hnhpnuio84up9g39jl7l129he@4ax.com> <hcc5qj5df9ct8e8hivsum9mjh9lttb3dcu@4ax.com> <vo182m$2lcqo$3@dont-email.me> <7l79qjp103a727j2l1skivi4sce4a2vd0p@4ax.com> <ns89qjpmi9u8dp64eb17umn4oqhktjedmi@4ax.com> <lad9qjl3fj5mqo3o4qkvkdeh6n2h553tk8@4ax.com> <vo2htb$303gs$5@dont-email.me> <1nm9qjpn9gbuoua6fodmqun421k628v3cu@4ax.com> <4ppaqj90kclbp4tphie1c5uqpe24ntq0f6@4ax.com> <buqaqj9nt4bf100nlvu8213v2dp48cecqr@4ax.com> <c4gbqj94t7vct8b5ot9v7ejco4vq0panc3@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9296ac8b1b8bb965b723aa70f85fcd1f";
	logging-data="3616504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19aqC5YgSPsC3uGQPzUN9dQIqRKZthCc2E="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CcnpEIeskaI8kH9/0VyEB1wuKJw=
Bytes: 3737

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 03:19:34 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:12:18 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:57:22 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:53:20 -0500, Catrike Ryder
>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:44:59 -0500, Frank Krygowski
>>>><frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 2/6/2025 8:22 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Need I repeat his nonsense about having a close friend who designed
>>>>>> guns for Ruger? 
>>>>>
>>>>>I gave documentation on that to some folks here who might have 
>>>>>legitimate interests in it, and would be civilized enough not to disturb 
>>>>>my friend's privacy.
>>>>>
>>>>>You don't qualify.
>>>>
>>>><LOL>
>>>
>>>Strange, I am always interested in guns and don't remember any
>>>documentation being given. Securest documentation?
>>>
>>>As an aside Ruger has always begged about how their guns were designed
>>>or developed. Why secrets?
>>
>>
>>Spelling Checker failed again -"Secret Documentation" :-)
>
>Supposedly, according Krygowski's bullshit, the man was already well
>know enough to have his name published in a magazine article, but
>naming him in a obscure Usenet group would violate his privacy.
>
>"He designed a gun for Ruger, doing the entire design pretty much
>solo. It included some features for which he received a patent. No, I
>won't violate his privacy, but I've seen his name (related to this) in
>a magazine article." 
>
>--Frank Krygowski
>https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Zu_BtGgv8Fs/m/K7AvAhPZBQAJ


If the guy received a patent how does Frank think he is going to
protect the bloke's privacy as patents are freely available.

In fumblingly around on the  web I discovered that
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/lie
 there are 141 ways to denote a liar.
and only 40 ways to denote the truth.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/tell-the-truth
(:-)

I also discovered two conventional responses to Frankie's posts:

'I believe there might be some discrepancies between what you're
saying and the facts. '

'It seems that the information provided may not fully align with the
actual circumstances. '
(:-)
-- 
Cheers,

John B.