Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:52:45 +0000
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com>
 <17dafa563c68a967$159724$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v56qu3$3qg7n$13@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <qpWdnXSHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:52:45 +0000
Lines: 63
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-T6bseBKR2RgddM88EskKf5slMrLnSvpi2IJHzr7gvzQvH5lUgDBaR5aNVXAc+tz4Fmdvzwk7Ziytjpj!mwKFddH5Xx/dMJfhCMO0ejlR4D5FBE36DvVB7pg7M4kjhEdH0p3rq0A+hzrSvAsd8Ig3gHHmXQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4032

FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/21/24 5:17 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 6/20/24 8:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
>>>>>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice 
>>>>>>>>>>> protesters
>>>>>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
>>>>>>>>>> trespassing.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing 
>>>>>>>>> it for
>>>>>>>>> 'social justice'.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
>>>>>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
>>>>>>> residential neighborhood.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why would you presume that?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my
>>>>> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's
>>>>> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.
>>>>> 
>>>> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property.
>>> 
>>> The street was private property, too, smooth brain.
>> 
>> 
>> Lying sack o' shit alert.  Can you prove to us the McShitbags owned the 
>> street?  Of course you can't because you're a lying sack o' shit.
>> 
> 
> Doesn't matter if the fucking King of Prussia owned the street, you 
> can't menace people with guns.

You can when they're menacing you.