Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<qq5ugjtqbonc8bopulo8m76cp9ektie9ml@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: If you're a fucking moron
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 21:31:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <qq5ugjtqbonc8bopulo8m76cp9ektie9ml@4ax.com>
References: <dvhpfjd1rh7uheoien02arle31q9fhcd57@4ax.com> <pnntgjpg7600brmmv63g3sspk9gt8g37ps@4ax.com> <ln8i3fFlipbU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 03:31:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0750ae5bd5fafdecd5505ee3734a729a";
	logging-data="2037021"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184cxJwakDkhIXfXmEH6mVIA2hyhdvTX8c="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c4izvPL1gOPj4Ygu2DuMfMVBP4E=
OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2071

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>> I will say, having had more experience with AI chat, it isn't useless,
>> it's not something I would rely on for serious work, but it's
>> entertaining to think of crazy things to talk about, to it.
>
>https://www.unite.ai/ai-girlfriends/
>
>https://nypost.com/2024/04/15/business/tech-exec-predicts-ai-girlfriends-
>will-create-1b-business/
>
>I find that rather disturbing. I wonder if the fee includes a blowup sex 
>doll?


AI cyber sex, I should've thought of that first! ;)

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.