Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<qukd1jt89r3r9d5tmuqhlp699i0j5e8au0@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: bike light optics Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:26:11 -0700 Lines: 39 Message-ID: <qukd1jt89r3r9d5tmuqhlp699i0j5e8au0@4ax.com> References: <uukcfb$3tspr$1@dont-email.me> <jrjPN.617728$Rq2.250265@fx15.ams4> <uumsuu$qiga$3@dont-email.me> <zyDPN.635506$Rq2.626274@fx15.ams4> <uun21g$rv7k$1@dont-email.me> <rxGPN.525218$jO2.46696@fx10.ams4> <uup9ad$1fo65$1@dont-email.me> <0ni91jlfr7qq71svg7panvdr10u6t7n7b2@4ax.com> <uv324b$4jcf$2@dont-email.me> <IteRN.19231549$ee1.7040372@fx16.ams4> <uv5rs5$temf$3@dont-email.me> <yJvRN.444084$Tp2.413276@fx03.ams4> <uv64cj$vua9$1@dont-email.me> <wKwRN.547679$ET2.22255@fx12.ams4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 4AxU2fB6+tcNNy0gO/DFzAYFfVJT1jEKSYMXKHIX2FvgYFjQcl Cancel-Lock: sha1:UEZfXboqwM7faapAn75dtDvRHys= sha256:gnj6dWyc0OUrHxpo3mBzvOGEfS+jKiULTYLlZK5ezIs= User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Bytes: 2787 On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:46:04 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: (chomp) >I’m told it’s 6 watts at 12 volts which makes sense ie double, but they are >claiming 12 watts which I’m sure is possible but improbable without >increasing the drag. Ie power in. Powering the light from a battery, which is re-charged by a dynamo, can be viewed as a perpetual motion machine. Each stage has it's losses. From the rider to the light, the overall efficiency is something like: dynamo_efficiency * battery_charge_efficiency * battery_discharge_efficiency * DC_to_DC_converter_efficiency * LED_light_efficiency If I assume that everything listed is 90% efficient, the overall efficiency is: 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 = 59% efficiency Including additional losses, such as wind resistance, drag, rolling resistance, battery aging will just make the efficiency worse. Note that I'm ignoring the caloric conversion efficiency of the rider diet to pedaling power. Such a charging system is similar to installing a gasoline generator in a Tesla EV to recharge the Tesla battery while driving. >But as Jeff has said hopefully we’ll get some documentation at some point. Once the company attorneys become involved and inform the marketing department that the company can be sued for making performance claims that can't be demonstrated, I would expect to see fewer but better specifications. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558