Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<r1a2vj9moa4irsq5posd5a7kf6q1emfs8f@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Future of online fora
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 09:12:44 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <r1a2vj9moa4irsq5posd5a7kf6q1emfs8f@4ax.com>
References: <vsm9g2$vpcs$2@dont-email.me> <vsma8i$vpcs$3@dont-email.me> <vsmf7k$15kf6$4@dont-email.me> <vsmfiu$1690q$1@dont-email.me> <lgntuj94n2gpmon2nrk53itutv2himgojr@4ax.com> <vsn965$1v127$4@dont-email.me> <uf7vuj9648tphbjl8n4oako52tstjdhm6s@4ax.com> <vsoksj$3f9r1$1@dont-email.me> <gdmvuj9uel8ke7i9nh2ubv1vrk1tpc9a0u@4ax.com> <vsp6bc$3uikn$3@dont-email.me> <gl80vjhqgl705gcb5v941hdg27s32p2jph@4ax.com> <vsq3iu$u1ot$4@dont-email.me> <vsr86c$27p9l$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:12:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="624172d14fd5f12d5391f1c3505304e9";
	logging-data="2466909"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/cNJ9pdNYKIi4H9z573b9FsvVBK2iOg/w="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zHwzOL1x5AYkAUGzc7ZXj2vkBoo=
Bytes: 3638

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:37:30 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> On 4/4/2025 2:36 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:53:47 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/4/2025 9:20 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are many ways to learn things, but when a person responds to
>>>>> another's stated opinion with, "lets discuss that," it can only mean
>>>>> they want to change your mind about it.
>>>> You're demonstrating gross inexperience with intellectual human
>>>> interaction.
>>>>
>>>> "Let's discuss that" does not "only mean" anything. It may _sometimes_
>>>> mean they hope to change your mind. But it may also mean "That's
>>>> interesting, and there's much to explore so we can learn more about it."
>>>> It may mean "I agree, and I'd like to review reasons why I think it's
>>>> true."
>>>
>>> If a person was open to a discussion, they'd probably say someting
>>> like, "here's an idea, lets discuss it. On the other hand, a person
>>> stating an opinion is not suggesting a discussion. If another person
>>> comes along and says "lets discuss that," they're looking to change
>>> your mind.
>
>Which is only because you regard personal interactions of any type as a 
>personal affront. It's a characteristic of narcissism. 

Poor Junior doesn't understand what narcissism is all about.
Narcissists seek out personal interactions. Their self image depends
on them....

>It's obviously 
>never occured to you that they may be interested in understanding your 
>position.

Asking a person to further explain their opinion is definitely an
intrusion.

>>>> It may mean many things. But since you're a person who bragged about
>>>> snarling at strangers who have said "Hello" on your bike trail, it's not
>>>> surprising that you see "Let's discuss that" as an attack.
>>>
>>> Not neccesarily an attack, but most certainly an incursion.
>
>"how dare you give me a friendly hello"...JFC what an asshole.
>

I'm open to a "good morning," but if a stranger walks up to me on the
street and says "hello," I'll assume there's something wrong with
him/her. On a bike ride, an open handed wave is the best I can do.

--
C'est bon
Soloman