| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<r7ld3kpnr93qchg4qtgj8c0fl3c30s8197@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 05:22:56 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <r7ld3kpnr93qchg4qtgj8c0fl3c30s8197@4ax.com> References: <19nb3k5q4pho824jtoqf3kbrsned4n7db6@4ax.com> <1015m1m$2t1jh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 11:22:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6f981d5ac5f71ffd0127f036add32c42"; logging-data="3348799"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199H77eKZiUhw5oCTy1m3M3" Cancel-Lock: sha1:iKO6hXx4QLAPUM+UFoJHrRA2Gxg= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250528-0, 5/27/2025), Outbound message Bytes: 2605 Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say: >On 5/27/2025 9:02 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: >> >> Recently, Frank Azor -one of the bigwigs at AMD- pointed out that the >> vast bulk of PC gamers (and even more with consoles) still play in HD >> resolutions rather than $K or higher. Close to 60% of gamers on Steam >> still have 1080p monitors. Many of the most-played games don't even >> use the added RAM necessary for HD. As such, Azor says, AMD's primary >> focus won't be on catering to the UHD/4K gamer, but to the larger >> market where 4-8GB VRAM are sufficient. >> >I feel the same about TV/Streaming/Movies and such. HD is just fine, >I'm not shelling out for the overpriced 4K TVs and re-buying all my >DVDs/Blu-Rays for 4K discs. Most people can't even see a difference >between HD and 4K. Hell I don't even buy Blu-Ray if DVD is an option - I literally see no difference between them, so 4K Ultra was never in consideration. Maybe if I had one of those huge-ass TVs I'd see a difference, but the 39" I have, you see none. Xocyll -- I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably, Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com