Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<rAh5bDTw1eh2J3ZtYvyyKZR5qRg@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <rAh5bDTw1eh2J3ZtYvyyKZR5qRg@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean References: <180f1778e64eec8d$354$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <18103c11c4399e1b$3635$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmSFX2R-ovBoEMObJLiwLJMFGUQ@jntp> <181050bd5e899136$3636$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <gS3CnAvH7iZAR8z2fpZ16WpwAQI@jntp> <181154a9986e9f2f$4267$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <WaumABhKFsF-a7vEtKketJC1SU8@jntp> <18115e21819b88b8$3999$1258271$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <wTCUwiP8r_6HV9_JWjpnDzzrCS8@jntp> <1811706c300cfbc4$3891$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: fpBOndrvjFGImcLVxudPJk3MNsw JNTP-ThreadID: 180f1778e64eec8d$354$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=rAh5bDTw1eh2J3ZtYvyyKZR5qRg@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Sun, 15 Dec 24 19:40:05 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0407bb36f28baf3782f66d28065baf1337db1425"; logging-data="2024-12-15T19:40:05Z/9142802"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> Bytes: 2374 Lines: 21 Le 15/12/2024 à 20:29, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : ... >>> It is not, of course. It's fibre, the speed of a >>> signal in fibre is much lesser than c and - well >>> - obviously depending on the speed of the fibre. >>> Just one of the differences. >> >> The procedure only requires a signal with a constant speed > > No. Procedure directly specifies - light in > vacuum. It's related with that "constant light > speed in vacuum" idiocy. His point was to prove that such a procedure exists. So he picked one kind of signal. The FACT is that it works exactly the same with any signal with a constant speed wrt the source.Do the math. Use your brain. Oh!