Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp> <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb7db913381cc9$330199$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmtVAt4HhKe0jdT-a3px1duKdmw@jntp>
 <v9i8c5$bvnu$9@dont-email.me> <VOohu46_lYfs6YEQG8qZQKYepNw@jntp> <v9ia7k$bvnu$11@dont-email.me>
 <FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp> <a610865812a2359182345fca40704d24@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: -4ZG3xz5c6dPufNhe50o28JPhK4
JNTP-ThreadID: L0IgA2CWtv7gPeDAAk57TJ-BbeQ
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 24 17:37:09 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-14T17:37:09Z/8986759"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 2747
Lines: 23

Le 14/08/2024 à 16:39, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>> R.H.
> 
> Actually, time passes MORE quickly at the satellite.  "Chronotropy" is
> a canard.  The rate of the satellite clock is set to run slow so that
> it is observed to run at the proper rate on the earth.  The reason why
> the satellite must be updated is because (1) the satellite is not in an
> exactly circular orbit and (2) the earth does not have a uniform
> density.
> 
> Someone (I'm not naming any names) needs to do some studying.

This is a very interesting post.
It asks a question: "How is it that the satellite, which apparently goes 
faster than the earth, has a time that passes faster, contrary to what SR 
predicts?"
We answer it as we can, today, the answer is that it seems that 
apparently, gravitation slows down time.
Since Richard Hachel is not too interested in GR, he does not believe in 
it too much. The other two arguments that you have just proposed do not 
seem any more judicious to me.
I have a fourth explanation, and it remains within the framework of RR.

R.H.