Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 07:03:57 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <rfdj2l-c8492.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <vivjmk$1m4s8$1@dont-email.me> <a6e2eb95631b7c655d8f67ceecad9d0b@www.novabbs.com> <829d9004f20fdfa2f6d626a89ff1cfec@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:16:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c946b056f8276f31cc75b5ba9aa8fe8";
	logging-data="494964"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lgGSX5c+/EY/uq7Ypkgsh"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z0R2qugvhwMC9GNKtUx1Pe+8uOI=
Bytes: 1846

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> Woof-woof, Arindam allowed me to post the background info. about rail
> guns in his 2013 seminal paper on the rail gun.
> 
> 
> 
> Arindam Banerjee and Dr. P J Radcliffe
> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
> Melbourne, Australia
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Abstract—Recent experimental work on model rail guns shows very little
> recoil upon the rails for the static case, where the armature or
> projectile does not move.

Of course there is no recoil in this case because recoil requires *MOTION*
as in Newton's laws of *MOTION*, crackpot.

It is clear you don't have a clue what Newton's laws mean, crackpot.

<snip remaining babble all based on ignorant nonsense>