Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<rr34cj99uhg9cqank3amgqnrlhqok9f0m2@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:14:13 +0000 From: john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: yes! Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:14:13 -0700 Message-ID: <rr34cj99uhg9cqank3amgqnrlhqok9f0m2@4ax.com> References: <2ugqbjhvlh9vrlmqhciaubcf64dbooph0o@4ax.com> <v9lp74$13417$1@dont-email.me> <p1usbj1jtg5st9ahr544q5pajc98o9vqsn@4ax.com> <v9ob65$1hujj$1@dont-email.me> <1gjvbjhf6h3rj3di3vmr1e681v6qi5mslr@4ax.com> <v9qkkf$1vkc1$1@dont-email.me> <bji2cjlic87l7hcf8qvfmh5si6o2gs5rln@4ax.com> <v9s1f4$2932f$3@dont-email.me> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 40 X-Trace: sv3-VVYf0bXf0j3DrKvAn+xQNLVFdF8hCekDb5ojauCh67H67jKsn/iTrNN9+1VLli2LaFJT3KZTjBF6iy4!jTg3r4mf3j+uzrfNoC/KmCZcL2MbMiVYGiU01XbH1+0J3tr9LPGVGpFJO4AVwyUCGobLOHu5HwSj!dBUEpg== X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2973 On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:39:46 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >On 18/08/2024 11:16 am, john larkin wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:54:38 +0100, Martin Brown >> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 16/08/2024 23:16, john larkin wrote: >>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 21:01:06 +0100, Martin Brown >>>> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OTOH I was visiting my tame biochemist friend today and he is interested >>>>> in it as he has always suspected that there was a lot more to myelin >>>>> sheaths on nerves than they are usually given credit for. A QM mediated >>>>> higher transmission efficiency of signals *might* just be plausible. >>>> >>>> My theory is that the electrical pulses we see in long nerves are just >>>> chemical refreshes, not the data carriers themselves. >>> >>> That isn't any kind of scientific theory - it is too feeble even to be >>> called a conjecture. Wild imagining is still far too polite. Crazy idea >>> perhaps? >> >> Consider the timing accuracy required to encode all the information >> from your foot, given just the obvious electrical nerve pulses. >> >> Now consider what happens to the relative pulse timings when you flex >> your limbs and body, when sound and shock waves slam your nerves, when >> your heart beats. >> >> Too much jitter for simple pulse-time encoding. > >Who would imagine that it was simple? Design is all about getting the >result you want from the hardware you've got, and while our nervous >system isn't designed, only those random mutations which lead to a >tolerably functional system survived natural selection. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ToSEAj2V0s