| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<rsecnaHYS4LC4Fv6nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 04:11:11 +0000 Subject: Re: evolution of bytes, The joy of FORTRAN Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc References: <vpl91g$25q46$1@dont-email.me> <vpsu8r$ljl$1@gal.iecc.com> <vpt7uv$3r2n0$3@dont-email.me> <175819294.762482901.217276.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vptp2b$1huf$1@gal.iecc.com> <vq1rmc$to24$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vq2j6n$v1q6$3@dont-email.me> <vq31t7$14njc$1@paganini.bofh.team> <1675186097.762702067.383557.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vq5enq$1h3mg$11@dont-email.me> <1444863307.762741352.676818.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:11:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1444863307.762741352.676818.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <rsecnaHYS4LC4Fv6nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 23 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-gRmfgHmUwPA3jIs5d6JGeq7ALVyoB4WrLZSb9xI5e8/ZtjAACXYuFSzFdM/5UQ9mk7rUZwE+XfKkb9t!cP8fgetZ4X4WCVnnf8pT6O1334sULBdiBcUShKqPHqLrwTdufZy67WWSJTMG+KEfonVGOswa1ZR3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2611 On 3/3/25 7:36 PM, Peter Flass wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 06:54:31 -0700, Peter Flass wrote: >> >>> Some fractions that are exact in decimal are only approximate in binary. >> >> Base-ten has two prime divisors: 2 and 5. Base-two has only 2. So any >> fraction that has a denominator that is the product of any integer powers >> of those divisors can be represented exactly, while others cannot. >> >> The need to represent 1/3 exactly is also quite common. That’s why I think >> the smallest place-system base that can cope with a reasonable range of >> fractions is 30 -- it has 2, 3 and 5 as prime divisors, and so can cope >> with fraction denominators made up arbitrary products and integer powers >> of all of those. >> > > 60 is nice The Babylonian number system was base-60 .... Maybe they knew something ? :-)