Article <sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem
References: <jU8lD51x3TEU8EM3MBCn_dr5mwo@jntp> <bfbd9c23228a1757c6d6e84778338e8e@www.novabbs.com> <lc13m1F7qgsU1@mid.individual.net>
 <rsrS0rFmndU99mqNBYCDLe8cFU0@jntp> <216ebf535d0d2a02a652841aa8ddba8e@www.novabbs.com> <uS_y7EWpgPGPmPD64dwz49GUbzs@jntp>
 <433858411d3c6aa17c39265c8a20a3f5@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: o3v4HSl7a34L2vCztEd-02SK-Cs
JNTP-ThreadID: Br6-kugn4e1tRMNvjK9C1usNMoA
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 24 15:02:43 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-02T15:02:43Z/8884796"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr>
Bytes: 2610
Lines: 33

Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> 
> You error hugely.  The watches have no "anisochrony" because they are
> stationary to one another and they have been synchronized.
> 
>> We cannot subtract one deformation from another deformation in 
>> such a simplistic way, and it is a serious relativistic mistake to do
>> so.
> 
> The mistake is one who has three Nobel prizes in basket weaving
> purports
> to know relativity.

Watches necessarily have anisochrony, but you don't understand this term.

You are confusing it with dyschronotropia.

It is obvious that two watches placed in the same frame of reference have 
the same chronotropy.

You're talking about a dog, and I'm talking about a cat.

You would also have to be a complete idiot to think that two watches 
placed on a table three meters apart do not rotate at the same speed.

That would be stupid!!!

They rotate at the same speed. Obviously.

They have the same measurement of time.

They have the same chronotropy.

R.H.