Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 20:22:02 +0000
Subject: Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <218bad07e23f4a46a00f34853e2bcf1d@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5ohjh$3rj15$1@dont-email.me>
 <f0d1b17bf2a89bba6f0f8348aff99bde@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5r9b7$f8df$1@dont-email.me>
 <96bd84ece14deb22140e6550e8fb0b66@www.novabbs.com>
 <66830d36$0$11690$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <Ua-dna9s78ID3R77nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6683add0$0$8240$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:22:06 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6683add0$0$8240$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <sKednaFub5b2_Bn7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-tx6q00zze6QeVDlIwQ4C1F4zpSjt6Sk0GPDEghXgrTcMypLz2Piulev/G/mfA59roZWdrj8le15ZeeC!XwBi6EA5W3IwccC565yQT9dhOAFjZsfHmZrkMgrkbtKwFwtEzwDM+DZdwSoOTm23oy1x0wYtKw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2469

On 07/02/2024 12:35 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/01/2024 01:10 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Incorrect. Relativity says light is affected twice as much as anything
>>>> else going the same speed, that is, twice Newtonian.
>>>
>>> Relatvity tells us that nothing else is going at the same speed,
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>
>> Relativity says that SR is local.
>>
>> The idea that information cannot go faster than light, basically
>> has that the light-like is free information itself.
>>
>> Yet, light is local,
>
> Where did you pick up that piece of misinformation?
>
> Jan
>

Einstein says so, and, "Relativity of Simultaneity is non-local",
and, "SR is local" is something at least I've arrived at since
quite a few years ago.

Einstein defines two different milieus for "Space-Time",
the "spatial" for GR and "spacial" for SR.