Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 19:17:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <b63aec6ac23c5f03f785a3b342122e74@www.novabbs.com>
 <ebb75c2571da5e06aef09861c2e2c6a1@www.novabbs.com>
 <6856ad6ee17097c4e1580e4f40c13043@www.novabbs.com>
 <vq6vc8$1ssfk$1@dont-email.me>
 <2e0a65293b1b9ab4c1510495f33ca7b5@www.novabbs.com>
 <vq9luv$2epgi$1@dont-email.me>
 <d92589ac131ee55c5fced0b12efb47b6@www.novabbs.com>
 <vqbmnf$2tbfk$1@dont-email.me>
 <a63f5ae63b8df78f44f6497220b17eeb@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:17:50 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a63f5ae63b8df78f44f6497220b17eeb@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <sbKcnXD27ed-aVT6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 28
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-DAxyqiQJwYcobGuKlUBQ3ejkxU2NvAkaJlI57i3J+CCOoAzN+ivOL56aJwRHpITZCRTrKLAn+tKASXM!raV3xARwcQ3ZzumAk9b5T1F+mkp1tA3Z/+F+Q7cSyxjgwkin3Sru0X2n8oIm2Xnpkyy6zkGooG0=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2499

On 03/06/2025 08:18 AM, rhertz wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 8:38:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
>> Den 05.03.2025 19:11, skrev rhertz:
>>>
>>> I question your assertion that E = mc² work both ways (mc² = E). This IS
>>> NOT AN EQUATION! This is a 1-way expression, which doesn't work
>>> reversing terms positions.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
>>
>> γ → e⁻ + e⁺
>
> I asked you not to come with the particle physics shit.
>
> Tell me about MATTER created by energy anywhere, in scales above the
> mysterious quantum world (of which, BTW, nobody knows shit even after
> 100 years).
>
> Do you have one example of 1 gramm of MATTER created by energy? (The
> reverse case of the stupid end in the 1905 Einstein's paper).
>
> No? Then, the inverse relationship m=E/c^2 DOESN'T WORK. Purely
> FICTIONAL.

Conservation is the same thing as constant creation and destruction.