Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<sfe07k1e2t2o7ob1lk0s9d2n18hvegrfql@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: The Sciences of the Artificial applied to Biology
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:16:48 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <sfe07k1e2t2o7ob1lk0s9d2n18hvegrfql@4ax.com>
References: <7out6k96b8cgjr3t5bdnr8g432shen7vqe@4ax.com> <901u6k99debtpilfo7tf9u6m7aka4o7ohq@4ax.com> <9a707kp9bb25rvi864d63qumspol391vpu@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:16:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c9a0ba2a27d09aa0de6d1cab401a694";
	logging-data="1149258"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lsTcdml6o8kC1c2ZtdBoi"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oXAFAV85pjh8Y0kzaC4uPMxTIZQ=

On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:14:51 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:04:32 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 19:38:41 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I forgot to mention that he Sciences of the Artificial digs deep into
>>>why living things (even microscopic ones) have distinct organs and
>>>often components within such organs, versus the organism being a mass
>>>of tissue that somehow does everything.  The driver is efficiency and
>>>simplicity.
>>>
>>>This assumes that life has already emerged in some unspecified way,
>>>and goes from there.  This is a different approach than Dawkin's
>>>Blind-Watchmaker arguments.
>>>
>>>Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>Ref:  "Simon_Herbert_A_The_Sciences_of_the_Artificial_3rd_ed" - The
>>>Architecture of Complexity.  New copies are available from MIT Press.
>>
>>Even single-cell critters have levels of intelligence. Some people
>>suggest some level of consciousness.
>
>I would not go quite that far.  Resembles ancient paganism and
>pantheism, where behind every rock and plant there is a god of some
>sort. 
>

But rocks don't have DNA.

Plants turn out to be pretty intelligent. A really good book is
Finding the Mother Tree by Suzanne Simard.

I'd really like to see the fiberoptic-like fungi network seriously
instrumented.