| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<sfe07k1e2t2o7ob1lk0s9d2n18hvegrfql@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: The Sciences of the Artificial applied to Biology Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:16:48 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <sfe07k1e2t2o7ob1lk0s9d2n18hvegrfql@4ax.com> References: <7out6k96b8cgjr3t5bdnr8g432shen7vqe@4ax.com> <901u6k99debtpilfo7tf9u6m7aka4o7ohq@4ax.com> <9a707kp9bb25rvi864d63qumspol391vpu@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c9a0ba2a27d09aa0de6d1cab401a694"; logging-data="1149258"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lsTcdml6o8kC1c2ZtdBoi" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:oXAFAV85pjh8Y0kzaC4uPMxTIZQ= On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:14:51 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:04:32 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 19:38:41 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> >>wrote: >> >>>I forgot to mention that he Sciences of the Artificial digs deep into >>>why living things (even microscopic ones) have distinct organs and >>>often components within such organs, versus the organism being a mass >>>of tissue that somehow does everything. The driver is efficiency and >>>simplicity. >>> >>>This assumes that life has already emerged in some unspecified way, >>>and goes from there. This is a different approach than Dawkin's >>>Blind-Watchmaker arguments. >>> >>>Joe >>> >>> >>>Ref: "Simon_Herbert_A_The_Sciences_of_the_Artificial_3rd_ed" - The >>>Architecture of Complexity. New copies are available from MIT Press. >> >>Even single-cell critters have levels of intelligence. Some people >>suggest some level of consciousness. > >I would not go quite that far. Resembles ancient paganism and >pantheism, where behind every rock and plant there is a god of some >sort. > But rocks don't have DNA. Plants turn out to be pretty intelligent. A really good book is Finding the Mother Tree by Suzanne Simard. I'd really like to see the fiberoptic-like fungi network seriously instrumented.