Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:44:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Scalar waves
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <l96663F16l9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <Me6dnRr7rMaN6rP7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:44:08 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Me6dnRr7rMaN6rP7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <sjudnd_SKc54F7P7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 105
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-CLmV46vJ/FH234BFsta7xPBO5Zl1ioyzaJ2UeF+w6kNrbM4gfCEt5NZa+XkSEhB+/80s/hVz8cEoWrs!3Le3RMY+h29EfFejzI3+1FrpABZC1piiyg+j4Uk+DYnmoE4uX1cnm3jkbohDfhU6TXBBj3EvlPg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4959

On 04/28/2024 09:19 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 04/27/2024 10:46 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Hi Ng
>>
>> I had read recently something from Tom Bearden.
>>
>> He wrote, that scalar waves are longitudinal waves, which vary in
>> velocity and are acompanied by a wave, which runs backwards in time.
>>
>> The idea is a little strange and would require to give up the constancy
>> of the speed of light in vacuum, but to allow a variation of the speed
>> of light in vacuum.
>>
>> This would cause a wavelike behavior, but longitudinal (opposite to
>> classical em-waves).
>>
>> This behaviour was called 'polarized in the time-domain'.
>>
>>
>> Is this somehow correct?
>>
>> (The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I
>> had assumed something similar before.)
>>
>> TH
>>
>>
>>
>
> It only goes backward, if at all: zero, so, ....
>
> What that models is that there is a region, all the region
> of the affected course of the wave, that is a "locale",
> that is a locality, and that according to observer
> effect and "real wave collapse", of a superclassical
> wave of a locale an extended region, that the "real
> wave collapse" is "superclassical flux", i.e. instantaneous.
>
> I.e., the only reason "model of a wave backward in time
> as if time was a dimension not a ray", is because,
> otherwise it's "model of a wave instantaneous in an
> extended region of space". It's only a projection,
> because, the real perspective, is a regional perspective,
> which is the locale, not just the point perspective.
>
> Waves are considered general models of change in open systems.
>
>
>
>


What happens is that perspective, includes,
a "point at infinity".

Now, in SR, for the L-principle and light's speed,
it's often considered in "natural units", the c = 1,
everything else in proportion to that.

Yet, as a "point at infinity", thusly, because as
a "natural unit" also is "beyond the bounded",
in the usual model of SR and in deep space in
an un-moving medium and freely untrammeled,
as a "point at infinity", in perspective,
behind it is another "point at infinity", "at infinity".


It's similar to consider when the medium is
measured by the travel of sound through air,
that the "natural unit" of Mach-1, is this same
sort of "point at infinity", "beyond the bounded",
that beyond it is that according to light speed,
"point at infinity", and beyond that is yet another
"point at infinity", when c_g gravity's speed is
"infinite", "natural units", or "scalars", for,
what results a, "scalar infinity".

Now, it's well-known, that the images received,
of objects in the Solar System, the sources,
are received as of after their travel. It's
also well-known, that, the principal component
of the instantaneous vector of force, of gravity,
always points at the _source_, not, the _image_,
except as so contrived when distances are fixed
and immobile and unvarying, which is not so in
the locale of the Solar System. So, c_g >= c.

So, the "scalar", in these considerations of
"point, local, global, total", get directly
involved with projection and perspective,
a "point at infinity" and "point(s) at infinity",
and, the "scalar" of "natural units", and,
the "scalar", of, "scalar infinity".

Then, this superclassical flux is as of whatever
recedes, so maintaining the symmetry of balance of
a continuity law, as so much more general than
a conservation law, that it's a "continuity-conservation"
law, that according to time symmetry "back-and-forth
from the point(s) at infinity", that it can be
considered rather directly, in terms of sound's
speed, and light's speed, and, light's speed,
and gravity's speed.