Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Favorite Font
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:00:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <slrn1002jo5.54u.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <1835a5c81ceedfd3$44418$19313$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <20250414092849.00004cdd@gmail.com>
 <pan$630f$11fc0600$4376005a$ad574581@linux.rocks>
 <20250415123306.00001fd1@gmail.com>
 <slrnvvvdsr.3gc99.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <20250416080602.00006325@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7f48e0529d2afcee29be8ff3e51815eb";
	logging-data="1351494"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mX6IPmI2YR0/k7Pc3pL8tc0/oVNdVkT+WBkdl9bIapQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CnXl2BolNL+x/z/ZQskxG7cumrQ=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2511

John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 15:06 this Wednesday (GMT):
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:00:05 -0000 (UTC)
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> wrote:
>
>> Neither is Times New Roman, or Arial. It gets the job done, and looks
>> clean enough.
>
> True enough - never liked those, either. I'd actually put the FOSS
> Alternatives (TM) over both, in a head-to-head; it just doesn't make
> Liberation *aesthetically pleasing,* is all.

Again, theyre Just Fine.

>> >> Print?  Does anyone still print?  
>> >
>> > Well, if I ever get around to finishing the typesetting for my
>> > novel...  
>> 
>> Do you mean printing documents from a standard printer?
>
> Well, more "intended to end up on paper at some point" than "I actually
> currently own and use a printer" - haven't used one on the regular
> since the mid-'00s. But I sure didn't write a novel to *not* hold a
> print copy in my hands at some point...!


Wow, you wrote a novel? Can we see?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom