Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrn100ni6l.1cqan.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Favorite Font
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:40:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <slrn100ni6l.1cqan.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <1835a5c81ceedfd3$44418$19313$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <20250414092849.00004cdd@gmail.com>
 <pan$630f$11fc0600$4376005a$ad574581@linux.rocks>
 <87wmbcguz9.fsf@somewhere.edu>
 <pan$4f5c8$f12b9163$46e2db5$f503da29@linux.rocks>
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 19:40:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="83e4bab3a42f4d93f51e7897cc78ff13";
	logging-data="535892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+piU103RhJMuUa3wHpr1xFMonCxlghy4JS6AWDPa6v+Q=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LaxFMUSmNhHNRKukQNfGTyJ1fH0=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 4227

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 21:50 this Wednesday (GMT):
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:56:58 -0300, Ethan Carter wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Print?  Does anyone still print?
>> 
>> The web has become nearly intolerable.  Even the choice of font is
>> horrible in nearly all websites, not to mention text size, image and
>> ads.  It's funny how sometimes I invoke the print-friendly extension on
>> my browser just to read /on screen/.  But the rule is to actually print
>> it out.
>>
>
> Well, it depends on the web site.
>
> A lot of sites are designed only for mobile and they are certainly
> terrible.  But such sites usually contain no worthwhile information
>
> Then there are the various blogs that use standard blog templates
> that are loaded with javascript.  Some of these blogs are worthwhile
> and can be saved in the browser using the "Save Web Page Complete"
> option.  This should be followed by stripping the HTML file of
> all javascript and then removing all javascript and CSS files.
>
> However, the best way to save web pages is to use either "wget" or "curl"
> followed, again, by stripping all the javascript an CSS files.

I personally at least try to make my website compatible with this, and I
agree that it is nice to be able to wget a single page cleanly. If you
need it, though, theres always the recurse and page-requisites options.

>>
>>  And books, of course: I print out a chapter to see if I want to
>> continue the reading and it's much lighter to carry a chapter than the
>> entire physical book.  Electronic devices are not flexible like paper
>> and they reflect light in a different way and you can't write on their
>> margins using a device that lets you feel the friction of pencil on
>> paper or pen on paper.  Some pens are such beautiful devices.
>>
>> Anything interesting I find on the web I print for later reading.
>>
>
> Whew!  You must spend a fortune on ink or toner.
>
> Saving web pages as described above, or printing to PDF, is the
> much cheaper, and in the long term more desirable, option.  The same
> applies to books.
>
> I have literally tens of thousands of web pages saved.  If I were
> to physically print all of those the paper alone would weigh several
> tons.
>
> It would be even worse for the digital books in my collection.
> Printing even a tiny fraction of those would break the foundation
> of my home.
>
> One has to get accustomed to preserving and consuming digital data
> as digital data.  With competent software, annotating digital content
> can be done with ease, and with far more capability than pen or pencil.
> The print medium is really no longer appropriate.


I haven't printed in a while.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom