Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<slrn1013tqi.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:11:30 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <slrn1013tqi.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
References: <oG5OP.1820195$BrX.647879@fx12.iad>
 <slrn100kcgb.ds7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <slrn100kfa7.edd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <1irOP.851750$d51.585824@fx46.iad>
 <slrn100mumt.dkd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vuh558$11toh$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrn100obf3.pd6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <slrn100oj38.81kf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <V74PP.2709395$OrR5.911761@fx18.iad>
 <slrn100rkkh.bh86.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <HTuPP.2635138$eNx6.1862988@fx14.iad>
 <slrn100ucb4.cuiu.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <slrn100uq8q.ju6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <SPKPP.534546$541.133137@fx47.iad> <m79u7iF2bf9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <slrn100vnke.a2i.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <xPRPP.2578086$2zn8.395648@fx15.iad>
 <slrn1010rkg.19bh.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <Cp4QP.2986768$t84d.1101795@fx11.iad>
 <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <xa6QP.2986769$t84d.1312598@fx11.iad>
 <slrn1012g43.20o7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:11:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="107c0e1eb3074cf4cdcb050899a40f11";
	logging-data="43323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sSLmK28U6Ubo+c213UfkfikO3LJO84io="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5FC6LyTJr8cScldblPEBk17gQTo=
Bytes: 4292

On 2025-04-29, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-29 10:21, Borax Man wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did to my
>>>>>>>>> machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You don't want to run 'df -a'.  I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but I think
>>>>>>> I've got it all cleared now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it. A
>>>>>> quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck, it
>>>>>> comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy to be
>>>>> wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is not going
>>>>> to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the line of... "even
>>>>> the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is pretty good." (I'm still not
>>>>> a fan of Gnome 3.)
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's
>>>> interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are proud
>>>> members of Antifa.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> They are?  Thats a concern if true.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation,
>>> they fit the definition.
>>
>> A contributor proudly announced that Gnome is Antifa on blogs.gnome.org.
>
> So is Lunduke basing his Antifa/Ubuntu connection theory on this one 
> contributor?
>
> It should be mentioned that the word "ubuntu" had a "philosophical" (almost 
> religious) meaning before it was used as the name for a Linux distribution. 
> The fact that Canonical choose this name probably indicates their belief 
> bias, but I haven't seen any evidence of an official Ubuntu/Antifa 
> connection.
>
> If I'm wrong, point me to the link or documentation.
>
By their own logic, if you have one Nazi at your table, you are all Nazis.

Using this standard, they are all Antifa, therefore supporting violence
and intimidation for political purposes.